On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:57:51PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:41:52PM -0600, Gary C. New wrote:
> > Are there any efforts to intigrate user_prefs with ldap?
> See Bug 2205. This is in production at some 350 sites now.
I have just updated bu
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:40:40AM +0100, Brian Read wrote:
> Seen this?
> http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/964/
> SA comes out pretty well, although it was run without the bayes db.
Actually, networking was also disabled. That is, SpamAssassin ran with
almost anything disabled. Adding Bayes, RB
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:43:00AM -0700, Brian May wrote:
> I though this was freaking funny... I've been reporting spam to the UCE
> address for over 6 months, then today I get this (over 200 of them)
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host arcticfox.ftc.gov[164.62.7.14] said: 550 5.7.1
> <[EMAIL PR
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 10:51:12AM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> I have just updated bug 2205
> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2205) with a
> new patch. That patch is against curent CVS as of Sun Aug 24
> 08:36:55 UTC 2003, which should be pretty much 2.60
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:03:02PM -0700, John Schneider wrote:
> This seems to work OK, but I'm not sure it is an efficient setup.
It is not. Provided that you have a scenario with non-linear
delivery and/or multiple users, there is practically no use at
all in calling spamassassin when you cou
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 04:36:02PM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> that I can just add?
The point is moot. Sobig.F expired on 10-Sep-2003, due to an
internal timebomb.
That being said, SpamAssassin-2.55 caught Sobig.F just fine for
me, no local tuning required.
See http://vvv.koehntopp.de/rrd/kri
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:34:40PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> 2. SobigF expired on September 10th. There may be a few
> errant worms floating around from computers that have their
> dates wrong, but you probably won't see many.
You won't see any. Earlier version of Sobig did use local
clocks
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 11:22:35AM +1000, Terry Allen wrote:
> 1 Is it possible to install Spam Assassin for filtering & deleting
> the spam without altering the existing sendmail configuration?
Yes, there is. If your machine is already using procmail as the
mailer for local delivery, it is enou
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:59:37PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> KK> There is currently no mechanism at all
> KK> that is part of the Internet which can lock out machines that
> KK> are dangerous or detrimental to the functions of the network.
> KK> There are no processes in place that identify
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 01:24:41AM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> computer. Most of these were DLS or cable modem id's - I
> figured it would be an easy matter for the ISP to monitor
> usage, see the problem, and simply shut down the problem
That is consistent with Sobig behaviour.
http://www.lu
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:06:44AM -0700, Steve Thomas wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 06:57:27PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp is rumored to have said:
> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:34:40PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> > > 2. SobigF expired on September 10th. There may be
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/09/16/0034210&mode=nested&tid=126&tid=95&tid=98&tid=99
Verisign today just added wildcard A records pointing to 64.94.110.11 to the
.com and .net zones.
How does this affect SpamAssassin and if it does, what are we
doing about this?
Kristian
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:38:53AM +, Muhannad Tamemi wrote:
> I need to know and make sure before i start , does spammassassin work with
> , solaries7 , sparc4 server and sendmail 8.9.3 ???
Get yourself a recent Perl (5.6.x) from sunfreeware.com, and a
recent sendmail (8.12.10) with MILTER e
Hi!
I have analyzed the latest Swen wave, and it seems that I
receive many mails from a very small set of machines.
I am about to modify my spamd in a way that it maintains a list
(a dbm actually) of IP-numbers it received spam from as well as
the time_t the spam was being received. I also plan
Sent to fitug-debate (actually a nontechnical discussion list) and to
spamassassin-talk. Reply-To set to me personally.
Please adjust accordingly.
A corpus of spam, freshly collected:
$ ls -l ~/Mail/OLD
total 96988
-rw---1 kris kiel 1676771 2003-09-24 23:59 spammed-probable.01.
Frank Pineau wrote:
> I wouldn't wanna run my MTA via inet (or xinet). It would
> make more sense to use the script to generate an iptables rule
> (or whatever firewall you use).
Again, this won't be useful because it does not generate a code
5xx error. Delivery of the mail will commence via you
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 23:17, Hannu Liljemark wrote:
> http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&file=faq02.006.htp
Fix worked fine. Thanks.
Kristian
--
Kristian Köhntopp, NetUSE AG, Dr.-Hell-Straße, D-24107 Kiel
Tel: +49 431 386 435 00, Fax: +49 431 386 435 99
-
I want to deploy SpamAssassin in a commercial environment, and I vaguely
remember reading something about licensed DNS databases.
Do I have to obtain licenses from some DNS database vendors for a SpamAssassin
default configuration? If so, where do I get them? If not, which are the
configuratio
Has anybody written a ConfSourceLDAP.pm analogue to ConfSourceSQL.pm? I am
looking for a solution that stores SpamAssassin Preferences within an LDAP
store.
Kristian
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 12:48:43PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 06:10:25PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> > Has anybody written a ConfSourceLDAP.pm analogue to ConfSourceSQL.pm? I am
> > looking for a solution that stores SpamAssassin Preferences
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 12:48:43PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 06:10:25PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> > Has anybody written a ConfSourceLDAP.pm analogue to ConfSourceSQL.pm? I am
> > looking for a solution that stores SpamAssassin Preferences
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:41:16PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> But the version number indicates software that might not really be mature.
> Perhaps a higher order configuration interface along the lines of
> getconfigvalue() and setconfigvalue() would be in order, which under t
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:46:13AM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> If you compile your own (release >= 2.1.10, say) Openldap
> stuff, the opportunity is there to compile in an SQL/LDAP
> interface module that can be addressed using ODBC or other SQL
> drivers. It's generally reckoned to be horrible b
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 18:10, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> Has anybody written a ConfSourceLDAP.pm analogue to ConfSourceSQL.pm? I am
> looking for a solution that stores SpamAssassin Preferences within an LDAP
> store.
This is an untested draft, which I am going to debug and test now.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 08:01:04PM +0100, Colin Dean wrote:
> Perhaps it's best to get some feedback on each separately to start with,
> and come back to this later?
Probably yes.
I need my code for a project where there is a master LDAP with
some 200 replicas nationwide, partially with 64 kBit/
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> One idea we've been thinking of for 2.70 or 3.0, was to use
> DBI for specifying database locations; in other words, just
> this.
>
> DBI uses URI-style strings to specify formats, access methods,
> etc. along with the db names; if t
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 06:11:20PM -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> Does a configuration exist (mailscanner, or such utilities)
> that would allow one to do a standard reject based on the hit
> score?
Exim has means to filter a mail through SpamAssassin while it is
being received in the SMTP dialogue.
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 04:22:15PM -0700, SpamAssassin wrote:
> Anyone have an idea of the Mail::SpamAssassin
> memory requirements?
Suse Linux 8.1, Intel, 2.4.x kernel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ps axuwww| grep spamd
root 926 0.0 1.3 24148 3272 ?SJun27 2:52 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/bi
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:48:20PM -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> >Quite soon, I could possibly be inheriting a spare Enterprise 1
> >(possibly fully loaded, i.e. 64processors etc...), for use with
> >spamassassin.
>
> Ok, dude. You totally win the "What hardware do YOU run SpamAssassin
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:41:25AM +0200, Kristian Köhntopp wrote:
> This is the revised patch, which I have tested and which seems
> to work for me now. I kindly ask you to apply this patch to
> 2.55 and test it. If you find anything, please report it to
> me. If the patch works for you, please co
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 05:00:32PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:47:39PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> > ConfStorageLDAP support, and if so, how do I get the patch
> > submitted into the SpamAssassin proper?
>
> As with all patches,
Is there a mailing list that deals with SMTP policy issues, or are there
other ressources in that direction (documents, FAQs and the like?). What do
you recommend.
I am thinking about topics like "What is better: A cluster with
a single MX, or multiple machines with separate MXes?" "What
trust ca
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:06:36AM +0100, Kevin Buzzard wrote:
> I know I can change the point scoring system in spamassassin, but I don't
> get the logic of the default set-up here: if an email is listed in Razor2,
> then how can it not be spam?
It could be a newsletter or another legit mail, th
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:41:52PM -0600, Gary C. New wrote:
> Are there any efforts to intigrate user_prefs with ldap?
>
See Bug 2205. This is in production at some 350 sites now.
Kristian
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built A
34 matches
Mail list logo
