On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 08:01:04PM +0100, Colin Dean wrote: > Perhaps it's best to get some feedback on each separately to start with, > and come back to this later?
Probably yes. I need my code for a project where there is a master LDAP with some 200 replicas nationwide, partially with 64 kBit/sec ISDN lines used for replication and mail forwarding together. If I were to store AWL or bayes data within the repository, the updates would kill me, thus my patch only addresses configuration data, which I consider to be static enough to be manageable by my infrastructure. In other setups the configuration may be different, and an LDAP AWL or even bayes store may be worthwile. And it would be useful to have SpamAssassin store config, AWL and bayes data in arbitrary locations including files, databases and directories, even if only for reasons of orthogonality and programmatic beauty - it would lead to some kind of pluggable architecture where one can easily add additional forms of storage without to much code. Kristian ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
