[SAtalk] spamd errors

2002-03-28 Thread Kevin Cosgrove
Sorry that I posted my original message to razor-users. I meant to post to spamassassin-talk. Here's the relevant discussion. Originally I wrote: kc> I can get procmail to work with spamassassin with this in the kc> procmailrc file: kc> kc> :0fw kc> | /usr/bin/spamassassin -P kc>

[SAtalk] spamc & procmail

2002-03-29 Thread Kevin Cosgrove
I can't get spamc v2.11 & procmail v3.11pre4 to cooperate on my Solaris 2.8 box. I've have spamc v2.11 and procmail v3.15 working fine on Mandrake 8.0. On the broken system I can pipe some spam to spamc and it get's altered, including the addition of the spam status line, just fine. If I cat t

[SAtalk] Re: spamc & procmail

2002-03-29 Thread Kevin Cosgrove
On 29 March 2002 at 21:34, Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What do those procmail recipes look like? The "broken" recipe looks like this: MAILDIR=/home/kevinc/Mail # DROPPRIVS=yes LOGFILE=/home/kevinc/var/log/procmail VERBOSE=yes # Tag spam, pass non-spam untouched. :0fw | /

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamc & procmail

2002-03-29 Thread Kevin Cosgrove
On 29 March 2002 at 20:02, Scott Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # Tag spam, pass non-spam untouched. > :0fw > | /home/kevinc/bin/spamc -p 7783 Add a "-f" (filter) to spamc so it passes the message along in your .procmailrc. -Scott I just tried that. No difference. Any more idea

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamc & procmail

2002-03-29 Thread Kevin Cosgrove
On 30 March 2002 at 4:51, "Tony L. Svanstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # File a copy of the spam. > :0: > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes > spamspool tls> This won't file a _copy_ of the spam, it will file the spam tls> and then sto= p; if you really want a copy of it (ie that tls> the filtering wil

Re: [SAtalk] spamc & procmail

2002-03-29 Thread Kevin Cosgrove
Permissions are readable by all. The test example you show works just fine. It's only from procmail that spamrc doesn't seem to connect to spamd [on my Solaris 2.8 box installed in my account space]. The whole thing works just dandy installed in system

Re: [SAtalk] spamc & procmail

2002-04-01 Thread Kevin Cosgrove
That could be equivalent to my set-up. I start spamd from /etc/rc.d/ init.d/spamassassin, which basicly runs "spamd -d -u spamd", where the spamd user has no privileges. I've attached my procmail recipe. Good luck... On 30 March 2002 at 9:13, Jeffrey Bacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So you'v

Re: [procmail] [SAtalk] spamc & procmail -- SOLUTION

2002-04-03 Thread Kevin Cosgrove
I started this thread a while back and now I have a solution. Briefly, I installed spamassassin at home on my Linux (Mandrake 8.0) box, where it's the mailserver and I'm the sysadmin. It was quite easy to get running and does a beautiful job in cooperation with procmail running a site-wide (my w