It's a problem if spammers can avoid spamassassin by forging mail from
people I've got autowhitelisted, like ... me.
Jan 27 22:12:03 kitenet postfix/smtpd[17022]: connect from unknown[211.144.2.66]
Jan 27 22:12:09 kitenet postfix/smtpd[17022]: 1C4C2BC01F: client=unknown[211.144.2.66]
Jan 27 22:12
This is a trimmed forward from a user. If there were really control
characters in one of these urls, I'd sorta expect them to show up as I
am composing this message in vim. Hmm, perhaps it is geeing overly
greedy about what constitutesa url, and thinks it's all one big url with
the whitespace bein
Daniel Rogers wrote:
> LINE_OF_YELLING seems to have jumped from a score of 0.70 in SA 2.01 to a
> score of 5.442 in SA 2.1. This strikes me as rather a lot. Aren't there
> still people who still write their messages all in caps because they don't
> know any better?
Yeah, like lawyers, warrante
I think this is interesting because it points at a place where the
TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL test may be commonly triggered (besides dman's
username) -- mail to mailing lists.
This may even be likely, if the user uses some kind of address book, and puts
in the list's name in the name field, and if the
Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > Changed to /HUNZA.{1,80}BREAD/i, Thanks.
>
> What the heck, I changed it to /HUNZA/i
I'm sure that will make some of the 20 thousand hits google finds for
Hunza happy (Hunza travel services, the Hunza royal family(!), Hunza
Graphics, Hunza Paki
All in good fun, I suppose. :-) I have a signature that scores about 30
points in spamassassin, but this is ridiculous.
Hmm, I wonder how many of you won't even see this message.
- Forwarded message from the Troll under the Belltown Bridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
From: the Troll under th
I have obscured all names and email addresses since this was private
mail, but it is an interesting false positive.
From: "xxx xxx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 19:29:15 -0400
To: "xxx xxx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"xxx " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"xxx-" <[EMAIL PROTE
