Re: [SAtalk] getting spamd to work with sendmail

2002-03-18 Thread Jeffrey Bacon
(procmail is used for local delivery, sendmail for everything else) ok, so I have a /etc/procmailrc file with only: :0fw | spamc in it and spamd running as: "spamd -d -c -a -F 0" but still no X-Spam-Status header is added to my mail. Greg Ward wrote: >On 18 March 2002, Jeff Bacon said: > >>I

Re: #2 Re: [SAtalk] getting spamd to work with sendmail

2002-03-19 Thread Jeffrey Bacon
ok, I tried setting /root/.spamassassin/* including subdirs as rw by ALL and setting thier group membership to 'mail' (same as my mail user who spamd is running as) still get: Mar 19 11:56:08 bacon spamd[22447]: connection from localhost [ 127.0.0.1 ] at port 45093 Mar 19 11:56:08 bacon spamd[

Re: #2 Re: [SAtalk] getting spamd to work with sendmail

2002-03-19 Thread Jeffrey Bacon
Why does the spamd have to access a dir on /root? Wouldn't it make more sense (and be more secure) to have it access (for example) /usr/share/spamassassin/default_prefs or something? Ed Kasky wrote: > Is the path navigable by the group "mail". ie: both /root and > /root/.spamassassin/ as wel

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd, sendmail, and procmail on a raq3

2002-03-19 Thread Jeffrey Bacon
if you use the -u option on spamd when you start it you can specify the username it will run as. By default, it runs a root and does a setuid() call to the user who invokes spamc. I use Red Hat and the init script that comes with spamd to start it. I just added "-u mail" (mail is me sendmai

Re: [SAtalk] spamc & procmail

2002-03-30 Thread Jeffrey Bacon
e SA > team, btw. > > > > > > ___ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > -- --