I've implemented spamd/spamc in a system with about 950+ users. As many of
you
are probably aware or have experienced, a select group of people can't handle
changes. They don't like to see the words "Likely Spam" in their subjects,
they can't handle technical thoughts, and they think my proacti
Can someone point out to me where spamc/spamd identifies the recipient of a
message when comparing it to all/more_spam_to entries in local.cf ?
I've found a bug in SA where if the recipient is not listed in the To: or cc:
line of the message SA is ignorant of the true recipient. This causes it
I have a feeling someone may have already thought of this, but I've been
tossing this idea around in my head lately.
If you're scanning on a domain basis (or just one account) and you drop a copy
of every identified spam into a place for later review, couldn't we somehow
extract the IP address o
What are the appropriate flags to run spamd for qmail-scanner?
I'm getting qmail-scanner header response that say "Clear:." but I can't get
the test-spam message to generate any X-Spam- style inserts. Does
qmail-scanner
cause spamd not to inject headers?
Am I missing something in the docume
This managed to get through twice today.
Here is the entire header (message below):
(btw: I have two separate qmail-scanner instances. One runs virus scanning,
one runs SA)
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 580 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003
We just replaced our old qmail-scanner + spamd system with a fresh install,
and we had a concurrency incoming of about 150. The old single processor
PIII 800 handled this just fine.
The new dual PIII 1Ghz would supposedly work much better. With
qmail-scanner 1.20 and spamd 2.60 it managed to run
