Perhaps I'm missing something obvious here, but I can't seem to make
SpamAssassin pay any attention to default configuration settings.
I'm using spamassassin from an RPM (spamassassin-2.20-1), and have tried
adding config options into /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, into
/etc/spamassassin/use
On May 22, 2002 11:46 am, Jason Baker wrote:
> Perhaps I'm missing something obvious here, but I can't seem to make
> SpamAssassin pay any attention to default configuration settings.
>
> I'm using spamassassin from an RPM (spamassassin-2.20-1), and have tried
> a
My company is both in Korea and in Canada, so we tend to get a lot of
collateral spam from Korean spamhouses AND legitimate mail.
One point I haven't seen yet in the ruleset is that there's a law in Korea
that UCE (or perhaps even UBE) must have a subject header denoting it. I
don't read/spea
On May 30, 2002 09:34 am, dman wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:32:55PM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> | I stopped /dev/null:ing e-mails a day or so ago, just to check if there
> | are any false hits there (partly due to spam passing SA and going to my
> | inbox).
> |
> | Today when I sent
This one got by with a 4.8/5... mostly in Korean, except for the footer. The
footer was worth having to read it though. :)
> If you could't understand this language, please click the rejection button.
> [rejection]
> Because of operation error, this e-mail may be delivered.
> Please click the r
On May 31, 2002 06:31 pm, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Jason Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This one got by with a 4.8/5... mostly in Korean, except for the
> > footer. The footer was worth having to read it though. :)
>
> The language guessing code (now in CVS) mig
Before I start wandering down this path, I thought I'd check to see if it's
already been done (and a quick google came up emptyhanded).
Has anyone added spamassassin into EZMLM mailing lists? I'm essentially
thinking to bounce to moderator if the score is above the limit, rather than
message-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Could there be a simple explanation? I can't see "SMTPD32" as a
particularly unique string... could something other than Imail also
stick this string in there?
I don't have any spam that trips this, or I'd look at the identifier a
little more clo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On December 19, 2002 12:55, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I need a more intelligent mail routing setup. The primary MX
> for our domain is a sendmail machine that runs spamassassin. It scans
> email, and then (via an entry in the
