On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 16:26, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:40:00AM +0000, Ian MacDougall wrote:
> > We have a similar structure, but for reasons I won't go into we have SA
> > behind our primary mailservers.
>
> Actually, would you mind going i
:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=7.0
tests=NO_REAL_NAME,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3 version=2.31
I always get a 1.6 from my webmail account.
--
Ian MacDougall
***
CONFIDENTIALITY. This e-mail and any attachments are
confidentia
agging the headers on
the rest. This means that those people who get a lot of spam can setup a
filter on their mail client and those that don't, don't see anything
unless they look at the headers.
Would this system be worth documenting and making available to anyone?
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 19:31, Bob Amen wrote:
> Ian MacDougall wrote:
>
> > Hello, (sorry for the disclaimer)
> >
> > I've put together a system using the Juniper smtpd+smtpfwdd daemons and
> > spamd, with a bit of perl glue in between.
> > Would th
only ran two or three email addresses through the spamassassin
part, all of the email run through the smtpd/smtpfwdd.
--
Ian MacDougall
**
CONFIDENTIALITY.This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may also be pri
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 18:35, Bob Amen wrote:
> Ian MacDougall wrote:
> > Well the idea came from the Linux Journal article a while back.
>
>
> Which issue was that?
Issue 92 see: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4882
> My problem with Perl as a m
>
> I think he means this juniper: http://www.obtuse.com/juniper/ :-)
Yes that is correct.
--
Ian MacDougall
**
CONFIDENTIALITY.This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not
t; SpamAssassin (slow) would deal with wire-speed routing (fast ;)
Oh dear, sorry for getting your hopes up. I'll still write it up as
there appears to be some interest :)
--
Ian MacDougall
**
CONFIDENTIALITY.This e-ma
ves, but we wanted to do that so that we could
scrub the most objectionable spam from our users email.
I can provide further details if you are interested.
--
Ian MacDougall
***
CONFIDENTIALITY. This e-mail and any attachments are
