Sorry if more than one question is taboo but I have 2 questions.
#1 I get the following in /var/log/maillog after I upgrading to
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.43
-- Nov 16 16:53:04 MyBox spamd[44251]: Still running as root: user not
specified, not found, or set to root. Fall back to nobody.
[root]:
Me too!
Mark
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:59:43 -0500 (EST)
Chris LaFrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am definately interested in checking this out. Thanks.
>
> --
> Chris LaFrance
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Is sloppiness in speech caused by ignorance or apathy?
> I don't know and I d
Maybe I'm missing something but where's the fnf.php? I have the header,
footer and index.php but there doesn't seem to be a fnf.php.
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:21:01 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also check out http://webuserprefs.pipegrep.net
>
> It's a PHP template for editing user_prefs fil
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spamassassin-
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-02-14 15:00 ---
Too bad they think that only 1 message will get them throught the door. :-)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34
This bug depends on bug 23, which changed state:
What|Old Value |New Value
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOL
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119
Summary: spamd paranoid mode behavior
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.11
Platform: PC
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120
Summary: No subject yields "All caps" test result
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.11
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121
Summary: My online telephone bill gets tagged as SPAM
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.20CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Pr
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122
Summary: LINE_OF_YELLING matches line of just periods
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Prior
[99252]: g2OGIlM99252: from=, size=3104, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<003b38d05aaa$8523e5e2$8be12ec7@kwc
bfr>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1]
Mar 24 16:18:48 username-3 spamd[93507]: connection from localhost [ 127.0.0.1 ]
at port 4078
Mar 24 16:20:48 username-3 sendmail
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124
Summary: spamd pid patch
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 1.5
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- You a
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125
Summary: [Debian 139777] Description for DATE_IN_FUTURE is wrong.
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.11
Platform: All
URL: http://bugs.debian.org/139777
OS/Version: All
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- You are
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126
Summary: Suggested rules for embedded HTML objects
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.20CVS
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Pr
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-25 14:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=14)
Patch
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- You are
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-25 15:07 ---
Works for me -- could you please attach the email to this bug using the "Create
new attachment" feature -- otherwise spacing gets messed up and stuff, and th
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-25 15:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=15)
spam that crashes SpamAssassin
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-25 15:33 ---
Too late -- I already checked in.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127
Summary: BUGGY_CGI score too high?
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.11
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Comp
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-25 15:43 ---
Just to add a comment here: You can add anything you want to your *own*
whitelists: see the config file documentation for details.
--- You are receiv
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128
Summary: Spam cache?
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.11
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: s
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129
Summary: Ideas for optimization..
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.11
Platform: Other
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-25 17:08 ---
I could have sworn there was already a report like this in bugzilla, but I
can't find it! I even think someone said they were working on it.
--- You
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130
Summary: Migrate to using MIME::Tools
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.20CVS
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-25 17:26 ---
*** Bug 18 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are wa
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- A
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- A
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131
Summary: SpamAssassin filter for mailman
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.11
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133
Summary: option to set X-message-flag?
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.11
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority:
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134
Summary: "spamc -c -f -d hostname" acts differently to "spamc -c
-f"
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.20CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-25 20:16 ---
It's likely not going to be as easy for people to run a Razor server as it is to
run Spamassassin. If folks feel that this is significantly helpful functional
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135
Summary: GAPPY_TEXT needs whitespace
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 1.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Com
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136
Summary: Body rules which should be case insensitive
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.20CVS
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Prior
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|spamassassin- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-25 21:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=19)
Patch to 20_body_tests.cf to make more tests case insensitve
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are th
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-26 00:25 ---
I have this set up already as a procmail hack, but built-in functionality would
be nice. One implementation note: Currently mine sends an X-message-flag head
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-26 01:19 ---
I had forgotten about this only working for POP mailboxes. I just tried it now
and confirmed that it didn't work (I don't usually use outlook, but many peopl
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-26 03:01
---
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Ideas for optimization..
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-25 17:10 ---
> OK, found it. #62 -- not s
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Additional C
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-26 03:32 ---
I was in favor of client-side caching for SA and RAZOR for a while, but I'm
mostly over it, unless somebody can show actual benchmarks that make it worth
th
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-26 07:05 ---
While I agree that razor would do this, how long will it be before razord is
released? I've been waiting since December, but for all I know, it could be out
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-26 09:42 ---
Ok, so 1.9 isn't secure either, but I still don't see how this alone should be
enough to flag something as spam.
Dan.
--- You are receiving this mail
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-26 10:06 ---
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam cache?
Well, you're going to have to use razor to calculate the message hash
anyway, why not use razor as the cache too?
---
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-26 10:32 ---
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam cache?
Best place to ask about how long till razord is on the razor-users
mailing list :) Sorry Vipul
C
--- You are re
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-26 10:42 ---
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI score too high?
Have you ever received a legitimate BUGGY_CGI message?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-26 10:45 ---
I'm not sure what you mean. I have customers who use formmail on their web
sites that are hosted with us and want to be able to send the resulting output
to
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Kevin Lewis (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code?
62 matches
Mail list logo