http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-03-26 00:25 -------
I have this set up already as a procmail hack, but built-in functionality would 
be nice. One implementation note: Currently mine sends an X-message-flag header 
like "7.8 hits; 6 required" - if SA could use a leading zero for scores < 10, 
brain-damaged Outlook could sort the messages by score correctly.

Also note that there are some known and unknown issues getting Outlook to 
consistently display this header. In my procmail code, I had to replace SA's 
default X-Spam-Status header with a simple "Yes" or else Outlook would ignore 
the X-message-flag header. Outlook also ignores the message flag header when 
messages are viewed in an IMAP folder - this trick works only with POP3 mail.

Procmail code follows - I use this after the main :0fw line for SpamAssassin 
and before the delivery rules. This just grabs part of the X-Spam-Report field.

:0fw
* ^X-Spam-Report:  \/.*;
| /usr/bin/formail -I "X-message-flag: $MATCH" -I "X-Spam-Status: Yes"




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to