64.142.16.37 (s2.habeas.com) is also listed in spamcop :)
http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=blcheck&ip=64.142.16.37
cahya
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:01:03PM -0800, Brian May wrote:
> Thought this was a little humorous... Habeas is Misusing their own mark?
>
> Content analysis details: (8.0 poi
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:26:06AM +0200, Carsten Engelmann wrote:
>
> I received several mails from jenny lips and they always have a header
> like this:
>
> >>>
>
> From: "jenny lips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Time: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 07:21:38 +0800
> Subject: Lower your pa
What is actually the meaning of number in Content-Type mail header?,
for example:
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0012_034345CD.43452343"
Since I don't see the same number in my ham, I assume that this number at the
end of Content-Type is somehow a random number. If t
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:07:09AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 02:10 PM 8/18/2003 +0200, Cahya Wirawan wrote:
> >What is actually the meaning of number in Content-Type mail header?,
> >for example:
> >Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
> >boundary="=_Nex
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Cahya Wirawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Envelope-From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Envelope-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 12:28:48PM -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote:
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> This is the statement I have in my list:
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] xnote.com
>
> but it isn't working. do i have the syntax right?
>
> where [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my email address.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:40:38PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 05:07:56PM -0700, Mark R. Cervarich wrote:
> > Return-Path to be from a domain that I whitelist. I thought
> > SpamAssassin was smart enough to not be fooled by that? Without that
> >
> > -Start Exerp
Hi,
many spams put the user login name in subject, and no real
person will write user login name like "cwirawan" in the subject.
how can I catch it in the rule? or is there such rule already?
thanks,
cahya.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored b
I got many spams where "From:" and "To:" are the same, but the
rule FROM_AND_TO_SAME didn't catch it, I use spamassassin 2.55.
here is the header:
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 19 12:04:58 2003
Received: from nepo1.mydomain.org (p2066-ipad04sizuokaden.shizuoka.ocn.ne.jp
[219\.160.187.66])
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 05:47:53PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 09:42 PM 7/22/2003 +0200, Cahya Wirawan wrote:
>
> >I got many spams where "From:" and "To:" are the same, but the
> >rule FROM_AND_TO_SAME didn't catch it, I use spamassassin 2.55.
>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:06:36AM +0100, Kevin Buzzard wrote:
> Perhaps a razor mailing list would be the place to ask this, but I am sure
> people here will know:
>
> I don't understand the logic behind:
>
> RAZOR2_CHECK (0.9 points) Listed in Razor2, see
> http://razor.sf.net/
>
> I
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:55:56AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 01:51 PM 7/24/2003 +0200, Cahya Wirawan wrote:
> >I think it is because white space in "jenny hewit"
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> >if it is: "jennyhewit"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:24:18AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > but our domain I get daily around 20 000 return messages to user that
> > dont exist
>
> Why do you accept mail to non-existing users at your site?
>
If you use incoming email gateway and all emails will be sent again to
>From what I understand, spamassassin can only give a static score,
there is no way to have score between 0 and max-score. and if we need
a variable score we have to create several rules like
BAYES_00,BAYES_01,...,BAYES_99 , and let all these rules executed.
Although only the first rule will sca
I can write my rule in local.cf or in users rules, but if I want
tp have my own eval function I have to write it directly on EvalTests.pm .
Since this file will be rewitten if I upgrade the SA, is there any plan
to have a local/users EvalTests.pm like local.cf for rules?
thanks,
cahya
Is it possible for habeas to make their watermark not fakeable?
because it is naiv to believe that no one will misuse their watermark
because of law, and it is naiv to think that they can find and sue
everyone who misused their watermark. And for us they have rbl system
we can use to check violator
16 matches
Mail list logo
