RE: [SAtalk] help with spam report

2003-08-22 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
I use expire_mail.pl I sort spam into users spam folders so they don't have to download via pop They can access with a web interface (or imap) to see the spam folder and then every week I run a cron job to expire mail from every users spam folders It gives a summary of what was erased, showing t

RE: [SAtalk] osirusoft gone mad?

2003-09-03 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
> > Martin Radford schrieb: > [...] > >>4) I am new to spamassassin. What parameter should I use in my > >>configuration to cause spamassassin to stop using osirusoft open relay? > > > > See the news article at http://news.spamassassin.org/ > > The instructions given there can't work, IMHO, be

RE: [SAtalk] spamd performance

2003-09-15 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
> > If performance is an issue, how about an option like... > > > > HIT_AND_RUN 1 > > > > ...that would cause spamd to stop processing once your threshhold had > > been met? IOW why keep scanning text once the message has been > > identified as spam? I'm sure that I'm missing something here but I'

[SAtalk] Timelog in 2.60 or lack thereof

2003-09-24 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
I tried to check time timelog to look at performance and check hit rates for dcc, pyzor, razor, etc. Only to find it has disappeared on me since I last used it. It is still in the man page though And the config options page was broken at SA.org debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin confi

[SAtalk] Procmail/Spamc Problem

2003-09-25 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
I know this is probably more of a procmail issue but I'll ask anyway as it involves Spamassassin. This is how I call it from my main server for system wide use DROPPRIVS=yes :0 * ! ? test -f $HOME/.sabypass { :0fw * < 256000 | /usr/bin/spamc -f -U /var/spool/spamassassin/spamd.sock :0: * ^X-S

[SAtalk] Feature request

2003-02-19 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
I would like to request a feature in the next development cycle, that feature being support for multi-hosting in SQL prefs, ie [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] are different users and need different prefs. thanks --- This SF.net email

RE: [SAtalk] Virtual Users for SQL Prefs

2003-03-04 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
there is a php interface for sql prefs the devel directory has an older version i have tried to contact the author to get the official dl site dont know what it is I have a copy of 0.6.2 which he emailed me at one time.. let me know if you want it... ill email it to you. > -Original Mess

RE: [SAtalk] I hate SpamAssassin

2003-05-27 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
>Because of you I am changing ISP's. There is no such thing as a >whitelist that works. Even if I receive valid mail and you have >targeted it as spam I cannot read it because you control freaks have >altered the e-mail. Anyone else having similar problems? Why not let >us have control of what happ

RE: [SAtalk] I hate SpamAssassin

2003-05-29 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
Stop smoking Crack :-), I was being figurative. I don't literally mean that everyone should send an apology email to every moron in this world. Obviously that would take to long. A simple change once and for all to the SA report that places the blame on the ISP and does not refer them to SA w

[SAtalk] Sitewide minus whiners

2003-05-29 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
For those people wanting to implement side wide SA but allow elective removal in an ISP situation you can make a very very simple change to your /etc/procmailrc :0 * ! ? test -f $HOME/.sabypass { :0fw * < 256000 | /usr/bin/spamc -f } then to bypass a user from SA just touch /home/bubba/.saby

RE: [SAtalk] OT- "greylisting" - opinions from the SA community?

2003-06-23 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
> > > This method proposes to delay EVERY SINGLE MESSAGE until a > database match > > is found for sending IP, FROM, and TO. > > > > So...we punish everyone in the world, and hope that a delay > of one or more > > hours is considered "acceptable"? > > I have to agree. I know for a fact tha

RE: [SAtalk] dcc

2003-07-31 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
I prefer fairly easy method of turning on timelog and then I grep for DCC from those files. -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:54 AM To: Sanjay K. Patel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] dcc At 07:28 AM 7/31/03 -0400, Sa

RE: [SAtalk] Web Front-end

2003-07-31 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
You can also look at the module at www.horde.org I use the horde project progs to supply webmail to my customers.. They have a nice sa module > > > > Does anyone know of a good web based front-end for spamassassin? > ... and does anybody know if there's some sort of "WebMin module" > to config

[SAtalk] php-sa problem

2002-11-02 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
I have spamassassin working and using mysql... but now im stuck on this.. >8)&0xFF; } } /* * STOP AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM */ if($status == 0) { // login >successful, redirect to index.php, checking to see // if redirect should use SSL or >not. $username = $post_username; session_register("usernam

[SAtalk] Setting up spamassassin sitewide with multiple mail servers

2002-11-25 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
Hi I am a newbie but couldnt find any relevant info on this subject I would like to run a sitewide incoming mail server that is running spamassassin. I have configured one for a customer to handle their mail just fine. my problem is that I have 4 different mail servers with 4 different user list

RE: [SAtalk] Setting up spamassassin sitewide with multiple mail servers

2002-11-26 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
ward file in the > user's home directory: > > "|IFS=' '&&exec /usr/local/bin/procmail -f-||exit 75 #username" > > > Hope this helps, > > Patrick > > > > On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 05:50 PM, Ben M. VanWagner wrote: >

RE: [SAtalk] Basic System Wide Setup (newbie)

2002-11-27 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
I had problems making the SA that came with redhat-8.0 work properly.   I removed the rpm and downloaded the source, followed the instructions like a good little boy and now it works.   I would recommend that as a first step.   I am using sendmail 8.12/imaps   allowing users to opt in and

RE: [SAtalk] Problems setting up spamc/spamd on different hosts

2002-11-27 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
So now I have a question about this. this poses an interesting solution to the problem Ive been asking about. the ability to run one computer to handle spamd requests and possibly have three or four machines passing the requests... is there a way to make it use local per user prefs then... if

[SAtalk] Spamassassin Problem with DCC

2002-12-06 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
I am having a little problem with dcc.. I have razor working fine and now im trying to get dcc and pyzor working these are the messages I get in maillog Dec 6 17:36:07 domain dccproc[12581]: send(dcc.dcc-servers.net (153.19.44.233,6277)): Operation not permitted Dec 6 17:36:08 domain spamd[12

RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin Problem with DCC

2002-12-09 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
5ca ba047729 Fuz2: 36d44c2e 073e9cdd 66491134 234a57fb > -Original Message- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:33 PM > To: Ben M. VanWagner > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassa

RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin Problem with DCC

2002-12-10 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
I figured this out needed to allow udp port 6277 through firewall just thought you might want to know had the same problem with pyzor, needed to add 24442 did not have this probelm with razor2 since it starts with a ping ... > I am having a little problem with dcc.. > > I have razor working

[SAtalk] Slow Razor check

2002-12-18 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
whatever happened to 5 secs max... im using version 2.43... 0.131: Starting raw body tests 0.134: Finished raw body tests (Delta: 0.003s) 0.134: Starting full message tests 0.135: Razor2 -> Starting razor test (5 secs max) 16.921: Razor2 -> Finished razor test: not known spam (Delta: 16.786s) 16.

[SAtalk] Spam Sorting and Purging

2003-01-31 Thread Ben M. VanWagner
I have spamassasin 2.43 running and I am quite pleased.. I have around 3000 users whose email is being sorted into a mail folder with procmail. the mail can be checked with a web interface (imp/horde) for false positives. however many of my customers are either too stupid or just dont care to lo