"Christopher X. Candreva" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Bryan Hoover wrote:
>
> > Can anyone please tell me generally how frenquently they're DCC is
> > hitting with SA?
>
> Well I just cleaned out my probably-spam folder a few minutes ago, but out
> of 23 in there now, 13 hit DCC_CHECK
Ah!
You still haven't answered how you're calling SA, but I'm going to take
a wild stab in the dark and assume you're using amavisd-new.
-how reliable the default config files are?
Not sure I understand. Reliable in what way? For this sort of setup,
you might not need to edit any of the spamassas
Well... it happened again. My Bayes files are trashed. No explanation. All
values in "sa-learn --dump magic" come back zero. No messages of interest
in the debug output of either the --dump or the --rebuild. At least none
that I can tell. Lots of "can't get lock" or "unlink failed" messages, but
On November 30, 2003 07:55 am, Jack Gostl wrote:
> Well... it happened again. My Bayes files are trashed. No explanation. All
> values in "sa-learn --dump magic" come back zero. No messages of interest
> in the debug output of either the --dump or the --rebuild. At least none
> that I can tell. Lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 November 2003 04:55 am, Jack Gostl wrote:
> Last time this happened I had to rebuild the databases. This time I
> thought I'd wait a bit to hear from people before I "destroyed" the
> evidence.
>
> Really is a very annoying problem with a
Hi,
I also get this error :
Cannot open bayes databases /home/mairhtin/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed:
Inappropriate ioctl for device
ARGH! :)
Mairhtin
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceFor
Hello,
I am suddenly getting errors on SA regarding Bayes of some sort. The error message is
:
Cannot open bayes databases /home/mairhtin/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: tie failed: File
exists
I'm not certain what is causing this, but it's clogging up my procmail.log file.
What might have cause
Nope... no such luck.
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Pedro Sam wrote:
> On November 30, 2003 07:55 am, Jack Gostl wrote:
> > Well... it happened again. My Bayes files are trashed. No explanation. All
> > values in "sa-learn --dump magic" come back zero. No messages of interest
> > in the debug output of
> > Last time this happened I had to rebuild the databases. This time I
> > thought I'd wait a bit to hear from people before I "destroyed" the
> > evidence.
> >
> > Really is a very annoying problem with a first class product.
> cant say in your caase but the only time I have ever had this is whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 November 2003 02:42 pm, you wrote:
> So, yes, I could rebuild, something that takes 30-45 mintues,
> but last time it took several tries. Worse is that I wind up with a
> significant number of false negatives before I even discover the pro
> On Sunday 30 November 2003 02:42 pm, you wrote:
> > So, yes, I could rebuild, something that takes 30-45 mintues,
> > but last time it took several tries. Worse is that I wind up with a
> > significant number of false negatives before I even discover the problem.
> >
> > Besides, this SHOULDN'T
Title: To bounce or not to bounce
Hi
Guys,
How
many of you use sorbs.net without too much trouble? I'm just testing
it at the moment and have had excellent results, but have had two complains
about FPs.
the
two complains we're about softwareobjectives.com.au and
bigpond.net.au
Hi,
> How many of you use sorbs.net without too much trouble? I'm just
Been testing with http.dnsbl.sorbs.net, socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
misc.dnsbl.sorbs.net, smtp.dnsbl.sorbs.net, web.dnsbl.sorbs.net and
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net over the last few days and so far it is all good.
I was using only dnsbl
Hi Jack,
My Grandfathers name was Jack... great name :)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Gostl
> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 7:19 PM
> To: Brook Humphrey
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes tra
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 02:02:26PM -0800, mairhtin wrote:
> Cannot open bayes databases /home/mairhtin/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: tie failed:
> File exists
That usually means you have a stale lock file lying around.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Aiee!" - Linux kernel error message
pgp0.
Jack Gostl wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 30 November 2003 02:42 pm, you wrote:
> > I do agree with you. Why would you be getting mails in like that though?
>
> This is an old email address. I've been watching the spams slowly
> increase. Too many newsgroup posts, too much online ordering, too much
> buy
FYI:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/14/45FEspam_1.html?networking
Commercial solutions win, spam loses
Brightmail, FrontBridge, Postini, and Proofpoint overwhelm open source
in accuracy, flexibility, and ease
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 09:57:13AM +0100, sietze wrote:
> > Thanks for your a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 November 2003 04:19 pm, you wrote:
> This is an old email address. I've been watching the spams slowly
> increase. Too many newsgroup posts, too much online ordering, too much
> buying/selling on ebay. Who knows. Until a few weeks ago, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 November 2003 06:34 pm, you wrote:
> PS to brook.. webmedic? Converted street person? or just a catchy
> name?
lol well i used to do medical work but no I started a computer store called
mobile pc medic and when i started my website ab
Thanks for everyone that answer this question, I'm really newbie on this
mater, I did download SA but I can't figure out how to install on windows
environment, I downloaded zip file but there isn't an install; ass soon I
can see.
Best regards
===
Ef
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Bryan Hoover wrote:
> Can anyone please tell me generally how frenquently they're DCC is
> hitting with SA?
DCC is working fine for me. I have three spams out of eight that arrived
in the last 30 minutes that have a DCC match.
--
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Pedro Sam wrote:
> Can anyone else confirm that "spamassassin -r" fails to remove SA markup when
> it invokes bayes learning?
How are you passing the message to spamassassin -r?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.
On December 01, 2003 12:08 am, Aaron Young wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Pedro Sam wrote:
>
>
> > Can anyone else confirm that "spamassassin -r" fails to remove SA markup
> > when
it invokes bayes learning?
>
>
> How are you passing the message to spamassassin -r?
My messages are in mbox forma
Has anyone experimented with applying a penalty for small emails? With
bayes or without I always seem to get a mail or two in my inbox. They're
all pretty small, under 1k for the message body. SA finds spammy stuff in
them but it's never enough to go above 5.0. They're anywhere from 3.8 to
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Gorm Jensen wrote:
> Bayes is working very well for me, but I am concerned about poisoning the
> database with extraneous, obfuscating words that many spam messages contain.
>
> A few postings to this list say that there is no problem, but I don't want
> to spoil a good thing
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Pedro Sam wrote:
> My messages are in mbox format, so I report/learn spam by:
>
> "formail -s spamassassin -r < SPAM_MBOX"
>
> But when I dump the contents of the bayes database, I found many tokens unique
> to SA headers and markup.
I found some header stuff but no other m
26 matches
Mail list logo
