[SAtalk] Gosh!

2002-11-30 Thread Tom Allison
Not even sure where to begin with this one... --- Nov 30 21:33:10 gandolf tallison: spamd starting Nov 30 21:33:12 gandolf spamd[21988]: Bareword found where operator expected at (eval 21) line 95, near "25FREEMEGS_URL_uri_test" Nov 30 21:33:12 gandolf spamd[21988]: ^I(Missing operator before

[SAtalk] question regarding resolution of potential username conflicts withspamd and SQL configuration storage

2002-11-30 Thread Albert Croft
I attempted to look through the archives for a solution to my question, but I was unable to find one as of yet. If this has been asked and answered, however, I ask only that you forgive my waste of your time, and point me to the appropriate resources. Background: I am attempting to set up SpamAssa

[SAtalk] Fwd: Spamassassin :-)

2002-11-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
Begin forwarded message: From: Ashley Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat Nov 30, 2002 16:25:18 Europe/London To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Spamassassin :-) Hi Matt, I saw your post on /. and thought you had a cool e-mail address and that it's great that you work on SpamAssassin, which I/

[SAtalk] SA and Postgres FYI

2002-11-30 Thread Paul Hancock
In order to get the SQL database option of SA to work with postgresql, I had to use a different format for user_scores_dsn. Once I used: DBI:Pg:dbname=;host=localhost;port=5432 where was the name of the database, it started working for me. -- Paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---

[SAtalk] Blacklisting / Re: Feature request (maybe)

2002-11-30 Thread Tom Pfeifer
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 12:05:36PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Message: 1 > From: "Rob MacGregor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 20:44:42 + > Subject: [SAtalk] Feature request (maybe) > > I'd really like to see a blacklist_to option somewhere, or so

Re: [SAtalk] Blacklisting / Re: Feature request (maybe)

2002-11-30 Thread Rob Tow
On Saturday 30 November 2002 13:09, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 12:05:36PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > > Simply create a rule for this, and assign a score above the limit, and it's > blacklisted. Or let the score just contribute to the normal spamcount. > See an exam

Re: [SAtalk] Blacklisting / Re: Feature request (maybe)

2002-11-30 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 07:36:31PM -0800, Rob Tow wrote: > On Saturday 30 November 2002 13:09, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 12:05:36PM -0800, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [...] > > > > > Simply create a rule for this, and assign a score above the limit, and it's > > blacklist

Re: [SAtalk] Gosh!

2002-11-30 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 09:34:54PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote: > Not even sure where to begin with this one... You've got old config files being found by SA. Make sure you clean out old files from the various places SA looks. -- Duncan Findlay

Re: [SAtalk] spamarchive.org corpuses have quite low success rates with SA

2002-11-30 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Michael Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Kinda hard to say. Most of it IS spammy and valid MIME as far as I > could tell. I did catch a few clearly-non-spam (evite) things in the > corpus. You caught or SA caught? ;-) > The lack of Received lines does mess up quite a few DNS related tests >