Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist

2002-07-14 Thread Mike Burger
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Chris Ogles wrote: > Can someone help me with whitelisting... > > This is my whitelist that I am trying to get working: > > whitelist_from"*@lists.sourceforge.net", > "*@ummail4.unitedmedia.com", "*@my-etrust.com" > > I have this placed in my user_perfs

Re: [SAtalk] Spam report

2002-07-14 Thread Mike Burger
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Brandon Knitter wrote: > > > Okay, that makes sense, I see...I thought it listed everything. > > > > It can only list what has been reported to it. That being said, Razor2 > > support isn't yet supported. > > Oh, so once Razor2 support is added (and I upgrade to that rev

Re: [SAtalk] faked `From: whatever@amazon.com'

2002-07-14 Thread John Rudd
On Saturday, July 13, 2002, at 06:46 , Jim Meyering wrote: > > Of course, the workaround is to add something like this to user_prefs > > unwhitelist_from *@amazon.com > > Yeah, I'd like to see something like that too. Primarily because I don't like the idea of modifying the global "from the

RE: [SAtalk] faked `From: whatever@amazon.com'

2002-07-14 Thread Michael Moncur
> > unwhitelist_from *@amazon.com > > Yeah, I'd like to see something like that too. Primarily because I don't > like the idea of modifying the global "from the distribution" rules files > in /usr/share/spamassassin. Perhaps the original poster was unclear - unwhitelist_from is a real paramete

Re: [SAtalk] faked `From: whatever@amazon.com'

2002-07-14 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 04:36:38AM -0600, Michael Moncur wrote: > Nonetheless, I'm currently unwhitelisting Amazon and eBay because spammers > frequently fake their 'from' addresses using these two. Personally, I turn off all the default whitelisting and don't usually have a problem. I can alway

Re: [SAtalk] The Spamming Bureau

2002-07-14 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi, Yup, we can probably add the following as a test :) My test account got spammed three times last night after signing up for their E-dress link. Spammed? If you believe that you have been spammed, then lodge your complaint with the Spamming Bureau. CLick below to go there now: http://spammin

[SAtalk] Setting up on SuSE

2002-07-14 Thread Rossz Vamos-Wentworth
Can someone send me a start/stop script for placement in /etc/init.d that works with SuSE 7.3? Since I am unfamiliar with SpamAssassin, I would prefer not writing this myself and potentially screwing up my mail system. Any assistance would be appreciated. Rossz -

Re: [SAtalk] faked `From: whatever@amazon.com'

2002-07-14 Thread Craig R . Hughes
Jim, please forward the spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- they'll hopefully be able to deal with it. Thanks, C On Saturday, July 13, 2002, at 06:46 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > FYI, > > I was dismayed to find obvious spam in my inbox today. > This came through with such a high score because amazon.

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist

2002-07-14 Thread Craig R . Hughes
Whitelist entries can either be on separate lines, as Mike describes, or you can put multiple address patterns on one line, separated by whitespace. No quotes nor commas. C On Sunday, July 14, 2002, at 01:30 AM, Mike Burger wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Chris Ogles wrote: > >> Can someone h

Re: [SAtalk] Setting up on SuSE

2002-07-14 Thread Bob Proulx
Rossz Vamos-Wentworth wrote: > Can someone send me a start/stop script for placement in /etc/init.d > that works with SuSE 7.3? > > Since I am unfamiliar with SpamAssassin, I would prefer not writing > this myself and potentially screwing up my mail system. Any > assistance would be appreci

[SAtalk] False Positive (non mailing list)

2002-07-14 Thread Suzanne Britton
In the many months I've been using SpamAssassin, I've only seen one false positive. I just checked it against the latest SA and it still gets flagged. I wonder if this could have been avoided (other than by raising the threshold, of course)? Suzanne - --- >From tril We

Re: [SAtalk] Setting up on SuSE

2002-07-14 Thread Malte S. Stretz
On Sunday 14 July 2002 20:22 CET Bob Proulx wrote: > Rossz Vamos-Wentworth wrote: > > Can someone send me a start/stop script for placement in /etc/init.d > > that works with SuSE 7.3? > > > > Since I am unfamiliar with SpamAssassin, I would prefer not writing > > this myself and potentially screw

Re: [SAtalk] Setting up on SuSE

2002-07-14 Thread Rossz Vamos-Wentworth
> The "typical" installation of spamassassin uses no daemons at all and > needs no start up script in /etc/init.d. If you have installed > spamassassin then put the following in your ~/.procmailrc file and as > mail is delivered it will be processed through spamassassin to be > tagged either yes

[SAtalk] Problems with add-to-whitlist

2002-07-14 Thread Frederik Seiffert
(I've sent this message to sa-devel before, because I didn't know about sa-talk. Sorry about that.) Hi there! I have made myself an mail alias to which users should forward mails whose adresses should get whitelisted: spamassassin_whitelist: "|/usr/bin/spamassassin --add-to-whitelist" In my

[SAtalk] Re: False Positive (non mailing list)

2002-07-14 Thread Michael C. Berch
I didn't see what SA had done with it or the tests or scores - perhaps you could post a copy with headers/body with the SA results in it? But as a larger issue, I have found that I needed to whitelist all my e-commerce vendors, since the stuff they send is often, for various reasons both due t

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist

2002-07-14 Thread Mike Burger
Thanks for the clarification. On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Craig R.Hughes wrote: > Whitelist entries can either be on separate lines, as Mike > describes, or you can put multiple address patterns on one line, > separated by whitespace. No quotes nor commas. > > C > > On Sunday, July 14, 2002, at 01

Re: [SAtalk] How to tell if dcc tests are working?

2002-07-14 Thread admin
Thanks Matt, That's what I needed. - mark ___ > > >From: Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: Night Realms >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [SAtalk] How to tell if dcc tests are working? >Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:34:09 -0700 > >On Friday 12 July 20

Re: [SAtalk] Re: False Positive (non mailing list)

2002-07-14 Thread Suzanne Britton
> I didn't see what SA had done with it or the tests or scores Okay, here's SA's analysis: X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.5 required=5.0 tests=DOUBLE_CAPSWORD,CALL_FREE,LINES_OF_YELLING, LINES_OF_YELLING_3,LINES_OF_YELLING_2,SUPERLONG_LINE, BIG_FONT,PORN_3,MSG_ID_