At 06/27/2002 22:13, Steve Wingate wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm using the p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.30 port on FreeBSD along with
>procmail 3.22. I'm having a few problems. I have this in my
>~/.procmailrc file (procmail has been working fine for a long while)
>
># Added for SpamAssassin
>:0fw
>| spamassas
Dallas Engelken wrote:
>> Dallas Engelken wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/ Are you guys fucking serious!!
>>>
>>> That's blocking over 250,000 hosts!!! The entire SBIS netblock.
>>> 64.216.0.0 - 64.219.255.255
>>
>> This has nothing to do with SpamAssassin. I'd rather not have t
Simon Lyall wrote:
> I've put up a little page of various local rules people have posted
> recently:
>
> http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/2002/0628.html
>
> Please lete me know if there are corrections, changes, updates.
This sort of thing would be great on a Wiki. Fancy sticking something on
http:/
> Anyone using 2.40 CVS? If so can you confirm that dcc reporting is
> broken?
Broken in what way? It *appears* to be working to me, or at least there is
no obvious sign of brokenness. This is all of the debug output I get:
debug: DCC is available: 1.0.53
debug: SpamAssassin: spam reported to
Robert Strickler wrote:
> How does everyone feel about building the logic to create and maintain a
> database of unsubscribe/removes that actually remove an address.
How will you ever know it's worked?
Matt.
---
This sf.net email is sponsor
