On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 06:39, Andre Bonhote wrote:
> I just received a spam with myself in the From: line. Yes, they put MY
> OWN E-Mail address there. That was not really funny, because the spam
> was not tagged as usual, but given -100 points for being in my
> whitelist.
>
> What can I do agains
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 22:07, dman wrote:
> The easiest way is to make a command line option and then tell the
> admin to configure the MTA to pass the data on the command line. I
> know that it would be easy for exim to do that.
The other easy method is to use SMTP or BSMTP injection - this woul
> I think the Genetic Algorithm (GA) assigns all the scores now.
> GA's are very
> powerful optimization tools, and if the GA lowered those scores, it likely
> raised (compensated) other scores that were more common spam signatures.
>
> The GA is only as good as the population of data it is run on
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> >> Actually, this raises an interesting issue with AWLs where it'll have
> >> no way of knowing you're you and not someone else with whom you
> >> regularly correspond, which is probably bad, because as you point
> >> out, the spammer can easily say th
I finally finished a web based front end for SpamAssassin with SQL and
have gotten permission from my employer to release it as open source.
You can check it out at http://www.wkrp.com/webusasin/
The powers that be are more than welcome to role it into
SpamAssassin if they like.
Feedback is we
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:37:46AM +, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
| On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 22:07, dman wrote:
| > The easiest way is to make a command line option and then tell the
| > admin to configure the MTA to pass the data on the command line. I
| > know that it would be easy for exim to d
On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 14:45, dman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:37:46AM +, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> | In terms of headers, Return-Path: would be the one to go for.
>
> Well, in your message that I'm replying to, there is no Return-Path:
> header. Maybe procmail sticks that in or som
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Jason wrote:
>
> I finally finished a web based front end for SpamAssassin with SQL and
> have gotten permission from my employer to release it as open source.
>
> You can check it out at http://www.wkrp.com/webusasin/
>
I goofed in the source. Sorry I had modified it to us
Hi,
What happened? It appears to be gone now.
Regards,
Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:29 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Web Based Front End
I finally finished a web based front end for SpamAssassin with S
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> What happened? It appears to be gone now.
>
Ok that's two for me. I tarred I but forgot the gzip part.
It should be fine now. My first project that I've actually
put things out on so I'm learning...
Jason
_
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 02:52:05PM +, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
| On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 14:45, dman wrote:
| > On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:37:46AM +, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
| > | In terms of headers, Return-Path: would be the one to go for.
| >
| > Well, in your message that I'm replyin
I've come up with a solution for the problem with not finding headers that
are in uppercase (ie, TO: instead of To: and FROM: instead of From:).
This problem affected mail from passport.com, as well as from other places.
For example, here's scoring on the mail from passport.com before this fix
Thanks Daniel,
I already fixed this in CVS though, in a "better" way. Basically, I
changed NoMailAudit so that get_header(x) will return all the headers
matching /x/i instead of /x/, and replace_header(x) will replace the
first header matching /x/i instead of the first one matching /x/ -- it
doe
I'd say that's probably the best way to do it -- given that all MTAs act
differently, I'd say it's best left to the individual sysadmin to
discover how (s)he might pass the envelope info, and then add their own
rules to SA.
C
On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 08:56, dman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 02:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is it possible to have SpamAssassin take different actions
based on the message's rating? For example, if the message was
from 5 to 7, flag it. If it's from 7 to 9, flag it and reply
to the sender, informing them that the message was flagged as
sp
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 21:00:48 -0600, Richie Laager wrote:
> Is it possible to have SpamAssassin take different actions
> based on the message's rating? For example, if the message was
> from 5 to 7, flag it. If it's from 7 to 9, flag it and reply
> to the sender, informing them that the mes
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Richie Laager wrote:
> Is it possible to have SpamAssassin take different actions based on the
> message's rating? For example, if the message was from 5 to 7, flag it.
> If it's from 7 to 9, flag it and reply to the sender, informing them
> that the message was flagged as sp
17 matches
Mail list logo
