On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 02:52:05PM +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
| On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 14:45, dman wrote:
| > On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:37:46AM +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
| > | In terms of headers, Return-Path: would be the one to go for.
| >
| > Well, in your message that I'm replying to, there is no Return-Path:
| > header. Maybe procmail sticks that in or something (I'm not using
| > procmail), but I don't know where it comes from.
|
| Return-path: is added by the MTA on final delivery. For exim its a
| transport option,
Ahh, got it now. Return-Path: and Envelope-To: headers are just as
good to me as a command line option. Either way the site's admin has
to set up the MTA properly to deliver the info.
-D
--
How to shoot yourself in the foot with Java:
You find that Microsoft and Sun have released imcompatible class
libraries both implementing Gun objects. You then find that although
there are plenty of feet objects implemented in the past in many other
languages, you cannot get access to one. But seeing as Java is so cool,
you dont care and go around shooting anything else you can find.
(written by Mark Hammond)
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
