Hi
Does any one have a program or script to send my customers to create
automatic a folder SPAM and make a rule in outlook to move all e-mail with
subject SPAM to that SPAM folder
I'm not a familiar with programming on windows vdb delphi or
Sjaak.
|| On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:58:19 -0600
|| "Hamilton, Kent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hk> EXACTLY the same experience. Killing spamass-milter and
hk> restarting it and things start working again.
Although I have very little time, I'm willing to fix any problem that
we can track down (I'd be
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 15:11:59 -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> You can hand edit the Makefile after perl Makefile.PL, but a
> probably better solution would be to find why MakeMaker on your machine
> is trying to link libndbm in. Could you add a line to the Makefile.PL
> in the spamc build rule to
Here's the final fix to this problem -- the trick was that the Makefile
was trying to compile spamc with the same flags that perl itself was
compiled with, which is overkill (particularly the libs stuff). So I've
removed the libs bits. This is checked into CVS now.
--- Makefile.PL 31 Jan 2002
Ok, any perl/BSD gurus out there? It spawns a new process but then
hangs trying to read STDIN from the new subprocess? This is either a
BSD bug or a perl-on-BSD bug, I think. There might be a way to work
around it though -- the trick would be to find some other forking tcp
daemon which does wor
Georg,
the problem seems to be on the spamd side; some kind of problem reading
from STDIN after forking on FreeBSD:
===
logmsg: connection from earth.hub.org [ 64.49.215.11 ] at port 4329
logmsg: before spawn
logmsg: after spawn
logmsg: connection from earth.hub.org [ 64.49.215.11
OK. I have done some ktrace dumps on both the milter process and
the milter with childs (milter->spamc). I'm not sure it is a problem with
spamc or spamd. It seems to be the spamass-milter process. The last thing
I see in common in both of these traces is a the spamass-milter trying t
Okay, have added what I think are the appropriate FreeBSD mailing lists
for this, since I know I can't answer this :(
On 13 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Ok, any perl/BSD gurus out there? It spawns a new process but then
> hangs trying to read STDIN from the new subprocess? This is either
The one issue that I know exists in FreeBSD is we've had known problems
with threads for the longest time ... is it possible that the problem is
in milter itself? Not even necessarily spamass-milter, but milter itself?
If we are going to concentrate on the perl side of things, in spamd, what
wo
I think we need to try and rule out the spamc/spamd combination with milter.
Can anyone think of a good way to try and trigger two spamc calls at the
same time to see if that hangs?
I don't think it would be to hard to change the $_ to $msg (or some other
variable). I do like the $_ used as i
Hi,
OK. I rewrite spamd to use $msg instead of $_ and still no luck.
Hey it was worth a try :-)
I still think we need to try and take the spamass-milter out of the
equation.
Kirk
Kirk Davis
Senior Network Analyst, ITS
Edmonton Public Schools
(780) 429-8308
[EMAIL PROTECTED
The log below though showed both spamd processes forking, and then
blocking, ie. apparently not getting passed the
local $_ = ;
line. I suppose this could be a problem with milter just not sending
the data to spamc so it then in turn is forwarding nothing to spamd, and
spamd is sitting there wa
$ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10; do spamc < test.msg&; done
That's a pretty easy way to test multiple spamc's in parallel
C
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 15:20, Kirk Davis wrote:
>
> I think we need to try and rule out the spamc/spamd combination with milter.
>
> Can anyone think of a good way to try
Craig, altho I can't see anything obvious with it, what is the chance its
the spawn itself? Have you looked at using
http://search.cpan.org/search?dist=Net-Server for spamd?
=
Net::Server is an extensible, generic Perl server engine. Net::Server
combines the good properties from
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:00:03PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Craig, altho I can't see anything obvious with it, what is the chance its
> the spawn itself? Have you looked at using
> http://search.cpan.org/search?dist=Net-Server for spamd?
>
> =
> Net::Server is an exten
It probably doesn't apply, but then again... anything to help narrow it
down, right?
I successfully have the proxyfilter working on a FreeBSD box, using
Postfix.
So, it'd probably point towards milter rather than FreeBSD.
( Just in case someone was thinking that FreeBSD was what one should
avo
Hi,
I would tend to thing it is linked to milter too (and/or the
threading) because amavis-milter tend to fail now and then.
Olivier
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> What's the status of the next release?
>
> I'd like to know, since I'm contemplating my options for Debian.
> Ideally, I'd wait package the next release, but I might release a
> Debian package with patches from the cvs or just fix Debian specific
> bu
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:43:18PM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > What's the status of the next release?
> >
> > I'd like to know, since I'm contemplating my options for Debian.
> > Ideally, I'd wait package the next release, but I might release a
>
Just a stupid question here ... but spamd ... it should be okay with perl
5.5, right? It doesn't require 5.6? I'm going to guess that all of us
with FreeBSD are at 5.5 right now, since its not available in the 4.x tree
yet except through ports ...
On 13 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> The lo
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:43:18PM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
>> > What's the status of the next release?
>> >
>> > I'd like to know, since I'm contemplating my options for Debian.
>> > Ideally, I'd wait
Hi there, SA users
I just received a spam with myself in the From: line. Yes, they put MY
OWN E-Mail address there. That was not really funny, because the spam
was not tagged as usual, but given -100 points for being in my
whitelist.
What can I do against this?
Thanks for your kind help
Andre
I think in theory it should be fine with 5.0; 5.5 should be very fine.
C
on 2/13/02 9:47 PM, Marc G. Fournier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Just a stupid question here ... but spamd ... it should be okay with perl
> 5.5, right? It doesn't require 5.6? I'm going to guess that all of us
> wi
Don't put yourself in your whitelist :)
Actually, this raises an interesting issue with AWLs where it'll have no way
of knowing you're you and not someone else with whom you regularly
correspond, which is probably bad, because as you point out, the spammer can
easily say the mail is from you. He
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:09:00PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Don't put yourself in your whitelist :)
Hah! Good idea ... but what if I am in the auto-whitelist?
> Actually, this raises an interesting issue with AWLs where it'll have
> no way of knowing you're you and not someone else with who
Andre -
> I just received a spam with myself in the From: line.
I don't rely on SpamAssassin for my whitelist. I use procmail to run SA,
and precede the recipe that invokes spamc with an include of a procmail
recipe file that filters my mailing list and other expected mail into
appropriate mailb
26 matches
Mail list logo
