On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:43:18PM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
>> > What's the status of the next release?
>> >
>> > I'd like to know, since I'm contemplating my options for Debian.
>> > Ideally, I'd wait package the next release, but I might release a
>> > Debian package with patches from the cvs or just fix Debian
>> > specific bugs.
>> >
>> > Any suggestions?
>>
>> As a user of your Debian package, I would /very/ strongly urge you to
>> release a patched version that corrects the NoMailAudit header
>> corruption bug.
>>
>> The problem is that the package demands a single space after the
>> colon in mail headers while, in the real world, zero or more space or
>> tab characters are acceptable...
[...]
> I understand... but then wouldn't 1.5 and all earlier versions been
> just as useless?
This seems to have been an introduced bug in the 'NoMailAudit' Perl
module that was used with the 2.01 release. This replaced the
Mail::Audit module, AFAIK, which didn't show this bug.
In any case, it was certainly introduced.
> I have never seen this header bug personally (AFAIK).
*nod* Most mail clients work fine. I only saw a dozen or two out of
some thousand mails, but that was enough for me. I /like/ uncorrupted
mail. :)
Daniel
--
Beware of the Turing tar-pit in which everything is
possible but nothing of interest is easy.
-- Alan J. Perlis, _Epigrams in Programming_ (September, 1982)
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
