Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd - must domains resolve?

--On Monday, January 12, 2004 10:07 PM -0500 Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Like this: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] NTDOMAIN.private.dns Should that work? No, not unless your MTA can resolve an IP to NTDOMAIN.private.dns and put it into a Received: header. NTDOMAIN.private.dns

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd - must domains resolve?

At 03:02 PM 1/12/04 -0800, Mike Batchelor wrote: I need to make some entries in whilist_from_rcvd. But the only hostnames in the Received: header that I can trust, are not resolveable. Does that matter? Yes it matters.. SA only looks at the RDNS portion of the Received: header. It will NOT honor

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question with multiple domains

> >No not entirely, apologies aren't necessary perhaps its me being thick >as a plank today me, too. >If mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] can come from different mail servers >@sprint, then surely you would need: > >whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] which would cover the host name. > This wou

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question with multiple domains

Mike Kuentz (2) wrote: Terry Milnes wrote: I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is NOT the same domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same servers and owned by the same people. I'm aware that sprintspectrum.com & sprint.com aren't the same domai

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question with multiple domains

> Terry Milnes wrote: > I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is > NOT the same > domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same > servers and owned by the same people. I'm aware that sprintspectrum.com & sprint.com aren't the same domain, th

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question with multiple domains

I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is NOT the same domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same servers and owned by the same people. whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprint.com whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprintspectrum.com Terry

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd

Yeah -- another factor as well -- there's a bug in 2.60 that if you specify that you trust the whitelisted network, it'll miss that whitelist entry. Do you have the Bugzilla ID for this? I have been searching the Bzilla db but can not find this bug listed. I presume since you mention this bug

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David B Funk writes: >whitelist_from_rcvd needs appropriate values for the trusted_networks >parameter before it works. >Given that you have a firewall configuration with internal/exteral >addresses on that SA box, it might be confused when trying to

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Martin McWhorter wrote: I am having a problem with whitelist_from_rcvd not working. I have Spamassassin running on a redhat 9 box with sendmail 8.12.8 as our companies gateway MTA. I have MIMEdefang running as well, but with the Spamassassin portion of the defang.conf comment

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd

Try explicitly setting trusted_networks. Sorry I should have meantioned that I do have the trusted_networks in my conf: trusted_networks 104. trusted_networks 10. Other possiblity, that "Add to Address Book" stuff in the 'From:' field might be confusing SA. That is just some WANK that Yahoo! adds

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd

At 12:28 PM 9/9/2003 -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote: Am I doing something wrong? This is the statement I have in my list: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] xnote.com but it isn't working. do i have the syntax right? where [EMAIL PROTECTED] is

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 12:28:48PM -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote: > > Am I doing something wrong? > > This is the statement I have in my list: > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] xnote.com > > but it isn't working. do i have the syntax right? > > where [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my email address.

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question.

Mike Kuentz (2) wrote: > Steve, did you hear back from any body about this? Any body know the > answer? Mike, I never did get a reply to my orignal post. But I did find a work around to the whitelist_rcvd_from not working with my implementation of postfix/SA. I ended up adding my own custom hea

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question.

Steve, did you hear back from any body about this? Any body know the answer? -Original Message- From: Cowles, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 12:11 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question. Mike Kuentz

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question.

Mike Kuentz (2) wrote: > To properly add the sender into whitelist_from_rcvd should it be > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 63.83.98.169 > > since they don't have reverse DNS set up? If not what should it be? > unknown is right before the IP address in brackets, but it's not a > domain n

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question

Try using whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] webmail2.usainteractive.com It seems that the second argument needs to be a FQDN server name not just the domain part.

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question

At 02:59 PM 6/18/2003 -0700, Mike Batchelor wrote: Received: from unys-2.namewithheld.com (webmail2.usainteractive.com [209.11.17.108]) by lax1msa1.tmcs.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/200306171005) with ESMTP id h5IJZO0q028359 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed 18 Jun 2003 12:35:24 -0700 "unys-2.n