>
>No not entirely, apologies aren't necessary perhaps its me being thick
>as a plank today....<g>
me, too.
>If mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] can come from different mail servers
>@sprint, then surely you would need:
>
>whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] which would cover the host name.
>
This wouldn't work because it's not [EMAIL PROTECTED], it's always [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>And if the mail can come from a server with a different host name and
>domain name like the sprintspectrum.com surely you would need to
>whitelist that host/domain name combination as well.
Bak to where we started! That's the problem, this doesn't work.
>> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprint.com
>> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprintspectrum.com
I was poking in the code and it looks like a hash is used for seeing if the user is in
the whitelist. I'm no Perl guru, so I could be completely wrong. When you add an
identical key to a hash, the first one gets over written.
>BTW What happened to Mike Kuentz (1) and will we be seeing a Mike Kuentz
>(3) in the near future?
Let's hope not, the first 2 are enough trouble as it is.
Thanks,
Mike (1)
†+wzf¢–+,¦‰ìo"0¸§»îâj[yÊ&y©ÞÆ«¶)Ë Õ¢¸î²Û!jº^Ÿ*.®É"–[Š î¥ú+
,·ž.)îÅ;¢¸š–ÂÞj¹Þêò¶§úèšØ^m«!²¥–Ú,ÊÆš)Â'$žŒ!¶Úý§l¢Çgr‰¿iØ×nüjYhr'wßh¥ÉbrD©jf¬±«,Š{Z–IšŠX§‚X¬µ*Z™«,jË"žÖ’X¬¶Ë(º· ~Šàzw†Ûi³ÿåŠËl²‹«qç讧zßåŠËlþX¬¶)ßû)jf¬±«,Š{Z–
