RE: [SAtalk] Training based on previously detected spam

2003-12-12 Thread Efren Pedroza
m Borland Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Training based on previously detected spam -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Graham, Thursday, December 11, 2003, 7:21:52 AM, you wrote: GB> I'm about to start training sa with spam and ham. Is it a good or bad id

Re: [SAtalk] Training based on previously detected spam

2003-12-11 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Graham, Thursday, December 11, 2003, 7:21:52 AM, you wrote: GB> I'm about to start training sa with spam and ham. Is it a good or bad idea GB> to use spam which has already been detected by sa's non-trained tests, or is GB> that a waste of time

Re: [SAtalk] Training based on previously detected spam

2003-12-11 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:21 AM 12/11/2003, Graham Borland wrote: I'm about to start training sa with spam and ham. Is it a good or bad idea to use spam which has already been detected by sa's non-trained tests, or is that a waste of time? Should I only train it with spam which is currently managing to slip through? W

Re: [SAtalk] Training SA

2003-12-10 Thread Matt Kettler
At 11:45 PM 12/9/03 -0800, Justin Mason wrote: Oh yeah, forgot to mention I finally got around to migrating all the FAQ stuff onto the Wiki ;) Heh, yeah, I caused me to go "Where the heck is that FAQ link???!!!" for about 5 seconds before I saw the wiki one.. Ok, my real impressions were a little

Re: [SAtalk] Training SA

2003-12-10 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Kettler writes: >and then the Bayes FAQ in the Wiki: >http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/BayesFaq >in particular: >http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/SiteWideBayesFeedback >and: >http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/UsingAnAccountForLearning Oh yeah, forgot t

Re: [SAtalk] Training SA

2003-12-10 Thread Matt Kettler
At 02:01 AM 12/10/03 -0500, kittonian wrote: Since the clients all download the mail and it becomes stored on the exchange server for the user's inbox, how exactly do I train SA to stop marking certain items? Our users are all over the place so if there's something I can setup where I can have

Re: [SAtalk] Training system-wide Bayesian filters?

2003-11-11 Thread Johann Spies
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:39:42AM +, Martyn Drake wrote: > I was wondering how I can use sa-learn to train a system-wide Bayesian > database? The way I've set-up SA at the moment is that each user has a > .forward file which runs "|/usr/bin/procmail -f-" and that in turn reads > the .pro

Re: [SAtalk] training...

2003-11-07 Thread Bob Apthorpe
Hi, On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Evan Platt wrote: > --On Friday, November 07, 2003 12:06 PM -0800 Jeff Lasman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What's likely to happen if I run these 563 spams without running any > > hams? > > I thought I recall the help file stating that running HAMS without SPAM (or >

Re: [SAtalk] training...

2003-11-07 Thread Evan Platt
--On Friday, November 07, 2003 12:06 PM -0800 Jeff Lasman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since my original training a few weeks ago I've gotten 563 spams in my > "spamuncaught" folder for further bayes training. > > What I don't have, is 500 or so ham emails that haven't been run through > befo

Re: [SAtalk] Training SA based on Outlook mailboxes

2003-06-02 Thread AltGrendel
Lucas Albers wrote: Their is another potential method you could use. Use the isbg.py imap python script to access the folders via imap and learn the spam. http://www.rogerbinns.com/isbg/ You could also use winbind to use the correcut NT usernames for the imap connection from the linux box. http://

Re: [SAtalk] Training SA based on Outlook mailboxes

2003-05-31 Thread Lucas Albers
Their is another potential method you could use. Use the isbg.py imap python script to access the folders via imap and learn the spam. http://www.rogerbinns.com/isbg/ You could also use winbind to use the correcut NT usernames for the imap connection from the linux box. http://nic-ks.greatplains.n

Re: [SAtalk] Training SA based on Outlook mailboxes

2003-05-31 Thread MaciEk J. MaciAk
I have kind of the same problem... I want my HAM to be sa-learned into sa but the messages are on a store other then the Linux box, and forwarding them will seem as if they are coming from an internal legit user. What format of file does sa-learn expect and disect ? -Maciek PS Francisco, sorry t

Re: [SAtalk] Training Bayes on SA filtered spam

2003-01-08 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:16:09PM +0100, Stefan Seiz wrote: > My guess is that sa-learnspam will filter out and ignore the spamassassin > specific header and subject prefix, but i am not sure about it (haven't > found anything in the docs either). From a quick look at the code, cleaning will happ

Re: [SAtalk] Training SA

2002-12-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:22:20AM -0800, JP Kelly wrote: > Is it possible to train SA 2.43 with known spam like sa-learn-spam does in > SA 2.50? 2.43 doesn't have any "learning" rules. 2.50 has a bayes-ish system which is what sa-learn-spam trains. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: How do I type