-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Graham,
Thursday, December 11, 2003, 7:21:52 AM, you wrote: GB> I'm about to start training sa with spam and ham. Is it a good or bad idea GB> to use spam which has already been detected by sa's non-trained tests, or is GB> that a waste of time? Should I only train it with spam which is currently GB> managing to slip through? You should train with all of your confirmed ham, and with all of your confirmed spam, regardless of SA's previous results. If you want, you can separate out those messages which were a) correctly identified, and b) went through the Bayes auto-learn stage, but that isn't necessary. Bob Menschel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBP9ksDpebK8E4qh1HEQKNTgCfVLoHbT2MAFmWhpHMrMV/4RCQ7eAAn0ev mQcGYgBaXMTPc4mZ7SchDhQH =ZaEQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
