At 8/23/03 08:18 PM , Greg Ennis wrote:
Why do you limit spamd to 4 processes?
Because my mail server is painfully underpowered and spamd seems to place a
fair amount of load on it -- see my other recent message about "dealing
with huge mail floods"; it gives some of the specs. Basically, when I
At 8/23/03 04:10 PM , Greg Ennis wrote:
>...when I boot the system spamd is started and I get no failure notice in
>the logs, but when I look for it as a process after about 30 seconds it is
>gone. When I use /etc/init.d/spamassassin start to activate it again it
>dies again. The only way I can
At 8/23/03 04:10 PM , Greg Ennis wrote:
...when I boot the system spamd is started and I get no failure notice in
the logs, but when I look for it as a process after about 30 seconds it is
gone. When I use /etc/init.d/spamassassin start to activate it again it
dies again. The only way I can g
Dark Alchemist wrote:
>
> I noticed a few people on the net and 1 in this group and now me that
> have to use spamd with the -D debug option on or our messages are never
> parsed. Is there a reason for this as it makes the maillog quite large.
>
> I tried everything I could think of over here to
