Matt Kettler wrote:
I've seen a lot of "empty body" spam myself lately. Personally I
attribute this to broken spam generation tools that somehow fail to
properly send the body of the message. There's lots broken mass-mail
software out there, as is evidenced by the "RANDOM_WORD" markup seen in
| I've been seeing this too, so I added the following rule to my local.cf:
|
| header __TEXT_HTML_BA Content-Type =~ /text\/html/i
| meta NO_BODY_BA __TEXT_HTML_BA && !HTML_MESSAGE
| describe NO_BODY_BA Message with no body
| score NO_BODY_BA 4
|
| It's been working great for me.
we strip text/
I've been seeing this too, so I added the following rule to my local.cf:
header __TEXT_HTML_BA Content-Type =~ /text\/html/i
meta NO_BODY_BA __TEXT_HTML_BA && !HTML_MESSAGE
describe NO_BODY_BA Message with no body
score NO_BODY_BA 4
It's been working great for me.
Sandy S.
- Original Message
VonEssen, John wrote:
I have been seeing this sort of spam come up on several different mail
servers I work on.
The email is definitely spam and it tests positive for a few RBL, but
not enough to raise its score significantly. The one I got the other day
only scored 2.9.
I know that on my system
At 12:57 PM 7/10/2003 -0400, VonEssen, John wrote:
I have been seeing this sort of spam come up on several different mail
servers I work on.
The email is definitely spam and it tests positive for a few RBL, but
not enough to raise its score significantly. The one I got the other day
only scored 2.9
> -Original Message-
> From: VonEssen, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] spam with no body...
>
>
> I have been seeing this sort of spam come up on several different mail
> servers I work on.
>
> The emai
