IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt
> At 07:57 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote:
> >Hello
> >
> >if i send myself the content of this file minus all the header stuff, it
> >doesnt register as spam ??
> >
> >hits = 1
There's something screwy with your installation. The
MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE rule doesn't exist in 2.55.
Dr. Ongo wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 tagged_above=-999.0 required=6.3
tests=DRASTIC_REDUCED, MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE, ONCE_IN_LIFETIME, REMOVE_SUBJ
X-Spam-Level: **
version 2.55
--
, May 30, 2003 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt
> At 07:57 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote:
> >Hello
> >
> >if i send myself the content of this file minus all the header stuff, it
> >doesnt register as spam ??
> >
> >hits = 1.7
> >
> >shou
At 07:57 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote:
Hello
if i send myself the content of this file minus all the header stuff, it
doesnt register as spam ??
hits = 1.7
should it be recognised as spam ?
What version are you on? What were the hits?
Myne scored a 4.3 with just the body (not headers):
X-Spam
Michael,
Thanks for the reply.
> You should run spamassassin --lint to check for a syntax error in a rules
> file - maybe not all rules are running? I get the following result on
> sample-spam.txt with network tests turned off (much higher with them on):
Everything checked out sane - I should've
Interesting, have you linted your configfile? sounds like your spamassassin
configs are messed up and it's not parsing all your rules.
I get a MUCH higher score, and even without and DNSBLs and Razor it's
still over 5.0. I get 10.40 for a normal run, and 8.90 for a -L run.
Here's my detailed r
