Michael, Thanks for the reply.
> You should run spamassassin --lint to check for a syntax error in a rules > file - maybe not all rules are running? I get the following result on > sample-spam.txt with network tests turned off (much higher with them on): Everything checked out sane - I should've processed it manually before emailing the list, but for what it's worth when I use spamc/spamassassin on the command line against sample-spam.txt, it does score it properly (10.4). The test I was using (which has worked before) is "cat sample-spam.txt | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]" using a shell account on a different box. I have also tried using a mailer on that box, and even a mailer from a third account, and it always scores 4.5 coming in that way. I run spamc with no options from .procmailrc, which has worked for a long while now. I did the upgrade using the FreeBSD ports system this morning, and so far no other spams have leaked through, though I have no idea if they're scoring as high as usual (my threshold is 5). I've tried switching back to using spamassassin in procmailrc, with the same results. Thanks again for your help. Roddie > > ---- Start SpamAssassin results > 9.60 points, 7 required; > * 0.9 -- From: does not include a real name > * 0.5 -- Received via SMTPD32 server (SMTPD32-n.n) > * 0.6 -- Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822) > * 0.3 -- From: contains numbers mixed in with letters > * 1.8 -- BODY: Information on how to work at home (2) > * 1.4 -- BODY: Drastically Reduced > * 1.2 -- BODY: List removal information > * 1.2 -- BODY: Once in a lifetime, apparently > * 0.1 -- Date: is 12 to 24 hours before Received: date > * 1.6 -- Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822 > > -- > Michael Moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/ > "Everything is in a state of flux, including the status quo." --Robert Byrne > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > Roddie Hasan > > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:10 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt scoring low > > > > > > I just upgraded from 2.43 to 2.50 (using spamc/spamd), and when I tested > > using sample-spam.txt, I got the following results. > > > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.5 required=5.0 > > tests=DRASTIC_REDUCED,HOME_EMPLOYMENT,ONCE_IN_LIFETIME, > > REMOVE_SUBJ > > version=2.50 > > X-Spam-Level: **** > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) > > > > I seem to remember older versions scoring in the 7s - I haven't changed > > anything on my end, and couldn't find any changes in INSTALL or Changes to > > warrant any further tweaks. > > > > Any assistance would be appreciated. > > > > Regards, > > Roddie > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. > > The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. > > Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. > > www.slickedit.com/sourceforge > > _______________________________________________ > > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
