Re: [SAtalk] sa-learning

2003-09-30 Thread Robert Nicholson
So really the crux of this task is to correctly reforward the email as a *.txt attachment and correctly identify said attachment before passing it to sa-learn. The first part being the toughest. as it's the kind of thing you want to automate or at least have done for you via a keystroke. So thi

Re: [SAtalk] sa-learning

2003-09-24 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > The message must be _exactly_ the same as it originally was, headers and > all. Even very subtle changes can cause the bayes engine to learn things > you might not expect. You want it to learn about ham and spam, not about > forwarded message formats.

Re: [SAtalk] sa-learning

2003-09-24 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:30 AM 9/24/03 -0400, Jon Fraley wrote: I just want to clarify this fact. I have seen contradictory statements posted. I am going to have users forward received spam and ham to respective accounts. Don't, unless they can forward the entire original message, complete with original headers, a

RE: [SAtalk] SA-learning from OUTLOOK

2003-02-13 Thread Bob Rasey
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 11:51, Jason Staudenmayer wrote: > That's the same setup I have now. Works great the old spam I get come from > my old mail > server. Is it best the save Outlook messages to my home dir and train SA > there? I guess it depends on your schedule... I don't do ANY local delivery