Re: [SAtalk] rule ideas..

2003-07-27 Thread Turgut Kalfaoglu
Ah! many thanks for the BIZ rule! -t - Turgut Kalfaoglu: http://www.kalfaoglu.com EgeNet Internet Services: http://www.egenet.com.tr --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, P

Re: [SAtalk] rule ideas..

2003-07-25 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 03:07 PM 7/24/2003 -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote: > >I have one that I've been using for some time that activates > >if the body contains a LINK to a .BIZ domain: [snip..] > I'd also suggest using \S* instead of .* after all, leading a regex off > with

Re: [SAtalk] rule ideas..

2003-07-25 Thread Evan Platt
--On Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:39 AM -0700 Chris Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then perhaps a rule that runs a spellcheck might be handy? All I sez bout that 1de@ is itz the fashizzy. w0rd. :-) I can just imagine the processing time for that one thou. Evan ---

Re: [SAtalk] rule ideas..

2003-07-24 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:58 PM 7/24/2003 -0700, Justin Mason wrote: also I think there's a rule in 2.60. Sad but true. Yeah, but it's not exactly a "star performer" based on scores. from the 50_scores.cf attached to Theo's announcement that scoresets 0 and 1 were done being GAed (note to those not following saDev,

Re: [SAtalk] rule ideas..

2003-07-24 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:07 PM 7/24/2003 -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote: I have one that I've been using for some time that activates if the body contains a LINK to a .BIZ domain: body BIZ_SITE /.*\.biz/i score BIZ_SITE 2.00 Might I suggest revising that from a body rule to a URI rule.. at the very

Re: [SAtalk] rule ideas..

2003-07-24 Thread Justin Mason
>TK> Perhaps if the sender has a .BIZ domain that could be a rule? > >I have one that I've been using for some time that activates >if the body contains a LINK to a .BIZ domain: also I think there's a rule in 2.60. Sad but true. --j. --- Thi

Re: [SAtalk] rule ideas..

2003-07-24 Thread Abigail Marshall
Hello Turgut, Thursday, July 24, 2003, 5:31:37 AM, you wrote: TK> Perhaps if the sender has a .BIZ domain that could be a rule? I have one that I've been using for some time that activates if the body contains a LINK to a .BIZ domain: body BIZ_SITE /.*\.biz/i score BIZ_SITE

Re: [SAtalk] rule ideas..

2003-07-24 Thread Matt Kettler
At 11:39 AM 7/24/2003 -0700, Chris Berry wrote: Then perhaps a rule that runs a spellcheck might be handy? Ouch... that'd kill all my messages right off the bat. --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Re

Re: [SAtalk] rule ideas..

2003-07-24 Thread up
...or from my domain (see address). I've actually had it caught in certain large sites filters. It may well be that they just have no clue what .am is... On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Evan Platt wrote: > > > --On Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:31 PM +0300 Turgut Kalfaoglu > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

Re: [SAtalk] rule ideas..

2003-07-24 Thread Chris Berry
From: Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --On Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:31 PM +0300 Turgut Kalfaoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also, perhaps if the sender's domain ends with a NUMBER, that could be a > rule? What about the people purchasing some real estate from their real estate agent at century21.

Re: [SAtalk] rule ideas..

2003-07-24 Thread Evan Platt
--On Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:31 PM +0300 Turgut Kalfaoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also, perhaps if the sender's domain ends with a NUMBER, that could be a > rule? What about the people purchasing some real estate from their real estate agent at century21.com ? I'll admit, there's a lot

Re: [SAtalk] rule ideas..

2003-07-24 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:31 PM 7/24/03 +0300, Turgut Kalfaoglu wrote: Perhaps if the sender has a .BIZ domain that could be a rule? also, perhaps if the sender's domain ends with a NUMBER, that could be a rule? You could easily make rules like that.. I don't think that they'd be effective enough to meet the S/O re