On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:20:47AM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> Incorrect. If a message is sent from a role address that goes to more than
> one person (e.g. a mailing list's moderator alias), or if the sender of
> the message has a .forward file with multiple destinations, then the
> bounce may end
On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Lars Hansson wrote:
>
> What you can do, if your mailserver supports it, is to block email
> with empty envelope sender that has multiple recipients. A valid
> bounce never have more than one recipient.
Incorrect. If a message is sent from a role address that goes to more than
* SqM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > There is no <> in the from: header. We were talking about the envelope
> > sender (envelope from, Return-Path:)
>
> You need to be able to recieve mail where the envelope is "<>".
Exactly.
> Normally bounced mail's have this sender... I.e. mails from
I thought AL
* Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > hi, I just wanna ask what rule should I aply to stop mails that have in
> > header from=<> .
> > thanks for any (hope there will be some hehe) replys
> >
>
> IIRC, that's a valid field.. some RFC somewhere talked about it.
> I forgot which one, but I
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:12:05PM -0700, Robert Menschel wrote:
> 1) I've checked my corpus, 3+ months of email, and I don't find any "<>"
> in any From header. Do I misunderstand the situation?
MAIL FROM != From header
MAIL FROM is the return path/envelope sender address and it must
contain *on
> hi, I just wanna ask what rule should I aply to stop mails that have in
> header from=<> .
> thanks for any (hope there will be some hehe) replys
If you really mean mail with an empty envelope from address of <> then you
must NOT block such mail, as this is the convention used by mailer daemons
- Original Message -
From: "Michal Gubik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:06 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] how to stop mails with from=<>
> hi, I just wanna ask what rule should I aply to stop mails that
> have in header from=<> .
That is not a good
At 01:14 PM 8/1/2003 -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
>
> hi, I just wanna ask what rule should I aply to stop mails that have in
> header from=<> .
> thanks for any (hope there will be some hehe) replys
>
IIRC, that's a valid field.. some RFC somewhere talked about it.
I forgot which one, but I've s
>
> hi, I just wanna ask what rule should I aply to stop mails that have in
> header from=<> .
> thanks for any (hope there will be some hehe) replys
>
IIRC, that's a valid field.. some RFC somewhere talked about it.
I forgot which one, but I've seen it pop up on the Postfix list a few
times.
Mab
