Re: [SAtalk] Detecting spam tagged mail on a 2nd pass.

2002-06-20 Thread Olivier Nicole
>It's been requested that if a message has been detected as SPAM already, >that it would be nice to have a ALREADY_ASSASSINATED rule that could >be used by the procmail delivery to process these messages seperately. Sounds to be a problem of configuring your Mail Delivery Agent (procmail or other

Re: [SAtalk] Detecting spam tagged mail on a 2nd pass.

2002-06-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
> Explain this Recipe if you would: > > |:0E > |* !Subject: BOUNCE.*:.*taboo header: /^X-Spam-Flag: YES/i > |{ > | INCLUDERC=$HOME/.procmail.d/spamassassin > | INCLUDERC=$HOME/.procmail.d/spam > |} > > Are the : you show here really the pipe | symbol meaning 'or'? > I assume BOUNCE is to a

Re: [SAtalk] detecting spam..

2002-02-28 Thread dman
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:19:26PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: | There is a mailing list called [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- you | can forward such emails there as an attachment. Please forward the | post-spamassassin processed message, not the unprocessed one. Before I ditch my mutt macro that, with one

Re: [SAtalk] detecting spam..

2002-02-28 Thread Craig Hughes
There is a mailing list called [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- you can forward such emails there as an attachment. Please forward the post-spamassassin processed message, not the unprocessed one. Thanks, C On 2/28/02 6:01 AM, "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a place/mailing list that I can s

Re: [SAtalk] detecting spam..

2002-02-28 Thread Gunter Ohrner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Thursday, 28. February 2002 15:01 schrieb Matt: > Is there a place/mailing list that I can send a SPAM message that got > through my SA setup. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greetinx, Gunter Ohrner - -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+ PDEPP Webserver: http://pdepp.Sour