Carl Chipman sagte:
> What do most people who write new SA rules set their threshold too? I
> had set it around 3.0 for our company, but the false positive rate was
> very high. I was looking at some of the big-evil stuff and noticed
> that many of the scores were 3.0 by themselves...
>
> Does e
Hello Carl,
Monday, January 12, 2004, 7:32:57 AM, you wrote:
CC> What do most people who write new SA rules set their threshold too? I had
CC> set it around 3.0 for our company, but the false positive rate was very
CC> high. I was looking at some of the big-evil stuff and noticed that many of
C
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Your threshold score
Above 5 and it goes into the SPAM folder, but these are at least cursorily
examined before trashing.
Above 10 and it goes directly into the trash, never to be seen again.
mh
At 07:32 AM Mo
Above 5 and it goes into the SPAM folder, but these are at least cursorily
examined before trashing.
Above 10 and it goes directly into the trash, never to be seen again.
mh
At 07:32 AM Monday1/12/2004, Carl Chipman wrote:
What do most people who write new SA rules set their threshold too? I
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Carl Chipman wrote:
> What do most people who write new SA rules set their threshold too? I had
> set it around 3.0 for our company, but the false positive rate was very
> high. I was looking at some of the big-evil stuff and noticed that many of
> the scores were 3.0 by
I let 5.0
works quite fine, except for
- some "technical publicity" (palmpowered.com comes to mind)
- broken mail clients who send mail in 8bit raw (instead of encoded mime)
- some newsletters whose editors apparently haven't read a book "howto do clean
html"
- some new style nigerian scam, writt
On Monday 12 January 2004 10:32 am, Carl Chipman wrote:
> What do most people who write new SA rules set their threshold too? I had
> set it around 3.0 for our company, but the false positive rate was very
> high. I was looking at some of the big-evil stuff and noticed that many of
> the scores w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 12 January 2004 07:32, Carl Chipman wrote:
> What do most people who write new SA rules set their threshold too? I had
> set it around 3.0 for our company, but the false positive rate was very
> high. I was looking at some of the big-evil s
I got a number of FP when i was using 5.0 so i am using 5.5 to mark and then
6.7 to delete. I would have liked to use 5 however to may client where
getting message tagged as spam that where not). I have only deleted 1
message by mistake in 25000 emails since friday and it was a "special" user
lol
I have ours set to 5.5. With 5.0 I had too many false positives. Our company came to the conclusion that a few missed spams were better than a few missed sales requests so we just deal with the handful of emails that get past the filter.
--Mike
From: Carl ChipmanSent: Mon 1/12/2004 9:32
Yes, I use the 5.0 default. My Bigevil rules go against my own
recommendations. The majority of my custom rules are between .33 and .55 in
score. But Bigevil is designed to hit 100% spam. It is the only set I have
scored high. FPs are taken care of right away.
I don't deliver the spam at 7.0 or h
yep 5.0. Works great for us.
/robert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl
Chipman
Sent: Montag, 12. Januar 2004 16:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Your threshold score
What do most people who write new SA rules set their thresh
What do most people who write new SA rules set their threshold too? I had
set it around 3.0 for our company, but the false positive rate was very
high. I was looking at some of the big-evil stuff and noticed that many of
the scores were 3.0 by themselves...
Does everyone just use the 5.0 that com
Carl
I think you will find that there are many different ways that people
configure there SA.
Here I:
mark at 5.0 (occasional FP's)
Delete at 10.0 (No FP's.. Yet)
Alan
> -Original Message-
> Behalf Of Carl Chipman
> Sent: 12 January 2004 15:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk
i use the default of 5 and it gets all spam except the MS update virii which
nearly always score 4.7
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:32:57 -0600, Carl Chipman wrote:
> What do most people who write new SA rules set their threshold too? I had
> set it around 3.0 for our company, but the false positive
15 matches
Mail list logo
