I'm going to repost a message from Gary Funck that solves this
nicely. I've been running it for awhile and it works like a charm.
--
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 29 08:08:49 2003
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 20:56:10 -0700
From: Gary Funck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: SpamAssassin listserve <[E
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:34:53PM +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
> What, using procmail to send the trusted mail straight to the mailbox,
> bypassing SA? (Procmail - another program I'll have to get to grips with!)
If you're using procmail, yes. Basically you need to put the logic of
"do I want to filte
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 11:06:41AM +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
> However, I still see SA checking info in the headers of the whitelisted mails.
> Is this normal, please?
Yes. A white/black-list does not stop SA from running over a message.
They simply add a certain value (positive or negative) to the
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:10:15AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> The only way to not have SA check a message is to not call SA under
> certain conditions.
What, using procmail to send the trusted mail straight to the mailbox,
bypassing SA? (Procmail - another program I'll have to get to grips w