RE: [SAtalk] Spam with score of 0.0

2003-09-09 Thread Joe Julian
Yeah, must be an installation problem. Without bayes I got: MONEY_BACK (1.0 points) BODY: Money back guarantee HTML_FONT_COLOR_UNSAFE (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color not within safe 6x6x6 palette HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color is red HTML_50_60 (0.5 poi

Re: [SAtalk] Spam with score of 0.0

2003-09-08 Thread Jason
That seems to be it. For whatever reason, /etc/mail/spamassassin was empty. It is corrected now & messages are receiving scores. HOORAY! :-) On 9/7/03 8:55 PM, "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would guess that's not finding the config files -- if there's no > rules, it'll run throug

Re: [SAtalk] Spam with score of 0.0

2003-09-07 Thread Justin Mason
Jason writes: > No. I use CGPSA to get the messages to CommuniGate Pro. > > I think it's interesting that it "Identified non-spam (0.0/5.0) for > in 0.0 seconds" > > Seems too quick. Anyway, here's the message. I would guess that's not finding the config files -- if there's no rules, it'll run

Re: [SAtalk] Spam with score of 0.0

2003-09-07 Thread Simon Byrnand
At 12:08 7/09/2003 -0700, Jason wrote: This message made is past SpamAssassin without setting off ANYTHING? (Score of 0.0.) [snip] Very odd. You must have something wrong with your setup there, as I see heaps of spams identical to that one that score quite highly... (somewhere between 10 and 20

Re: [SAtalk] Spam with score of 0.0

2003-09-07 Thread Jason
No. I use CGPSA to get the messages to CommuniGate Pro. I think it's interesting that it "Identified non-spam (0.0/5.0) for in 0.0 seconds" Seems too quick. Anyway, here's the message. 12:12:30.24 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) out(25): 54 FILE Queue/360223.msg\n 12:12:30.28 2 PWD-00035([127.0.0.1]) '[EMAI