At 7/28/03 07:41 AM , Yorkshire Dave wrote:
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 08:52, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> What's UBE? I'm sure that the U stands for "Un" and the E for
"Email". What's
> the B for?
Yorkshire Dave has defined the A, B and C. The U is actually "Unsolicited".
Just in case the above isn't a
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 08:52, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> What's UBE? I'm sure that the U stands for "Un" and the E for "Email". What's
> the B for?
Bulk or Boilerplate
the other two definitions you'll often see are UCE where the C means
Commercial, and UAE where the A means Automated.
--
Scann
> I get about 20 bits of spam a day and much more ham than that in mailing
> list and personal traffic; I can wait 10 days to collect enough spam to
> train SA (NB: 251 spams since 7/15.)
>
> If it takes you more than a week or two to collect enough spam and ham
> to train Bayes, you don't have mu
Hi,
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 15:53:40 -0700 John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday, Jul 27, 2003, at 12:27 US/Pacific, Nix wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Daniel Carrera stipulated:
> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:00:13AM +0100, Nix wrote:
> >>
> >>> Spam actually seems to differ quite a lot
On Sunday, Jul 27, 2003, at 12:27 US/Pacific, Nix wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Daniel Carrera stipulated:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:00:13AM +0100, Nix wrote:
Spam actually seems to differ quite a lot between individuals,
Really? Why would that be the case?
I think it depends which spammers' ma
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Daniel Carrera stipulated:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:00:13AM +0100, Nix wrote:
>
>> Spam actually seems to differ quite a lot between individuals,
>
> Really? Why would that be the case?
I think it depends which spammers' mailing lists you've landed up on.
--
`We canno
Daniel Carrera wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:00:13AM +0100, Nix wrote:
Spam actually seems to differ quite a lot between individuals,
Really? Why would that be the case? The whole point of spam is that it's
intended for no one in particular and they make no research to find out if
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:00:13AM +0100, Nix wrote:
> Spam actually seems to differ quite a lot between individuals,
Really? Why would that be the case? The whole point of spam is that it's
intended for no one in particular and they make no research to find out if
you are at all likely to in
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Daniel Carrera stipulated:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone have a pool of spam they can lend me? ;)
>
> I'm trying to teach SA's Bayesian filer. I have no shortage of ham to
> give it. I brought the ham pool almost to 500 messages just today. But I
> only have 60 spams to gi
