On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Robert Menschel wrote:
> I submit all my rules through the online Bugzilla system, following the
> documentation at http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/ContributingNewRules
Well, thank you yet again, for your help. I have (finally?) submitted
this proposed rule as bug #2982.
I k
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Regis Wilson wrote:
> As was noted before, a negative test will false-positive when there is
> no X-O-IP header.
Right, but I did resubmit the rule with an [if-unset] clause added. If
you missed that message, I can resend you a copy off-list, but the gist
is to simply append
>A friend of mine also has suggested the following (the coding is my own,
>so if it doesn't work, I've poorly implemented the suggestion):
>
> header SYL_BAD_XOIP X-Originating-IP !~ /\[?(\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\]?/
>
As was noted before, a negative test will false-positive when there is no
X-O-IP
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Robert Menschel wrote:
> Would you have any objection to submitting for consideration,
> and sending in an Apache Contributor License Agreement so the SA
> developers can use this rule?
I don't object, and I'd be happy to do it. However, from what I can
find (unless I'm misu
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Christian Nygaard wrote:
> It would be nice if one could take into account a Spam probability
> also based from the originating Received From: header lines. I.e. I
> would want to have a whitelist of known good mail servers and assign
> them a negative score test value and a h
