-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 23 Apr 2002 3:31 pm, Vivek Khera wrote:
> Unfortunately, to do this, Net::SMTP::Server::Client needs to be
> modified, and the author of that module hasn't decided how to do that
> yet... So it is a bit of surgery for now, and I've not yet
> "DP" == Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DP> spamproxyd accepts email via SMTP, runs it through SpamAssassin and then
DP> forwards the result via SMTP to another SMTP listener.
I've looked over the code to spamproxyd and there is a gaping hole in
it that will lose your mail if so
;Mark Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: postfix and spam assassin
> Can Spamproxy be used instead of procmail without breaking individual
users'
> procmail recipes?
>
> Mark
&g
Can Spamproxy be used instead of procmail without breaking individual users'
procmail recipes?
Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Pittman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:13 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Re: postfix and spam assassin
> On Mon,
