"Chris A. Kalin" said:
> I've been mentioning this problem off and on to the mailing list since 2.41.
> With 2.41, SA would eventually crash if the "-m" option was used, and now
> with 2.42, it will occasionally crash whether or not "-m" is used. I've got
> SA running under daemontools' supervi
supervise so if it does go away, it comes
right back and I don't even notice.
Chris Kalin
- Original Message -
From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Quinn Vallance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:01 PM
Quinn,
We run two very high volume servers here as well, and have seen the exact
same thing happening, spamd dies, with nothing logged. This is only on
2.42.
Brian
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Quinn Vallance wrote:
> I maintain two relatively high volume mail servers both of which have
> been u
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:27:18PM +0200, Jost Krieger wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 03:01:43AM -0700, Quinn Vallance wrote:
> >
> > I maintain two relatively high volume mail servers both of which
> > have been using Spamassassin for some time mow. Everything has
> > always worked fine and I
o 2.42 and continued to not use
the -m switch, and I haven't had a crash once.
Chris Kalin
Netwurx, Inc.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Brunette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:35 AM
Subject:
in
Netwurx, Inc.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Brunette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:35 AM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: Spamd 2.42 Problems
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Quinn Vallance [mailto:[
> -Original Message-
> From: Quinn Vallance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Spamd 2.42 Problems
>
>
> I maintain two relatively high volume mail servers both of which have
> been using Spamassassin fo
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 03:25:46PM +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> This sounds like a really grave problem. Could you please open a bug in
> bugzilla.spamassassin.org? Quinn, do you run on Solaris, too?
Done, bug 1087.
>
> And there's really nothing in the syslog? If it's possible, could you p
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 14:27 CET Jost Krieger wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 03:01:43AM -0700, Quinn Vallance wrote:
> > I maintain two relatively high volume mail servers both of which have
> > been using Spamassassin for some time mow. Everything has always worked
> > fine and I have alw
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 03:01:43AM -0700, Quinn Vallance wrote:
> I maintain two relatively high volume mail servers both of which have
> been using Spamassassin for some time mow. Everything has always worked
> fine and I have always upgraded to the newest stable versions when released. I
> up
10 matches
Mail list logo
