Re: [SAtalk] Re: Auto-whitelist improvement ideas

2002-01-21 Thread Justin Mason
> > The thing is, if a spammer is claiming to be an actual person, but > > isn't, then that person who's being impersonated almost certainly has > > legal recourse for damages from the spammer. If I were a spammer, I'd > > avoid doing this, just in case I used someone's address who cared enough

RE: [SAtalk] Re: Auto-whitelist improvement ideas

2002-01-21 Thread Craig Hughes
It doesn't actually invoke PGP or GPG to check anything, it's just seeing if you are claiming to have signed a message. C On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 23:16, Michael Moncur wrote: > The thing is, if a spammer is claiming to be an actual person, but > isn't, then that person who's being impe

RE: [SAtalk] Re: Auto-whitelist improvement ideas

2002-01-21 Thread Michael Moncur
> The thing is, if a spammer is claiming to be an actual person, but > isn't, then that person who's being impersonated almost certainly has > legal recourse for damages from the spammer. If I were a spammer, I'd > avoid doing this, just in case I used someone's address who cared enough > to com