Well, a follow-up:
I figgered out that I probably had to “remake”
and “remake install”, etc.
Which I then proceeded to do, and then *BOOM!* I get a “compile error”
on Razor2.
Bear in mind that I had no problem
installing it before. Further bear in mind that I even erased the who
At 13:21 28/07/2003 +0100, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai MacTane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 July 2003 17:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Oops... running 2.60
>
>
> Actually, I doubt those BAYES_00 hits are doing you
At 7/28/03 05:21 AM , Tony Hoyle wrote:
I wipe the bayes db every couple of weeks to avoid this (over time
it starts giving more and more FNs). I wiped it again just after
sending the message, so it'll take a little while before the BAYES_00
creeps back again.
I had the same problem with Bayes...
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai MacTane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 July 2003 17:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Oops... running 2.60
>
>
> Actually, I doubt those BAYES_00 hits are doing you much
> good, either. If
> messages
At Fri Jul 25 16:42:09 2003, Tony Hoyle wrote: [reformatted]
> I've found 2.60 is a generaly bit better than 2.55, but recently the
> spammers have worked around it... I now get about a couple of dozen
> spams a day coming in with ridiculously low scores (<2, usually) -
> they're heavily exploitin
At 7/25/03 08:42 AM , Tony Hoyle wrote:
I've found 2.60 is a generaly bit better than 2.55, but recently the
spammers have worked around it... I now get about a couple of dozen spams
a day coming in with ridiculously low scores (<2, usually) - they're
heavily exploiting the low scoring HTML_IMAG
> -Original Message-
> From: Colin Henein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 July 2003 17:32
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Oops... running 2.60
>
>
> Greetings all,
>
> I've been running 2.60 for several months (must have picked
> the wrong download back there somewhere
> With cool places like http://www.wholelattelove.com - it's very likely!
> Trust me, I did it! ;)
Haha! There is hope! *grins*
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
http://
Sorry about that, folks. I should learn to drink more caffinated beverages
by the afternoon... but what's the likelihood of that? :-)
With cool places like http://www.wholelattelove.com - it's very likely!
Trust me, I did it! ;)
---
This S
If you look at a bug in bugzilla, in the header info at the top of the ticket,
there's a link that says "Create an attachment". Click that, then follow the
directions.
C
Olivier Nicole wrote:
ON> >Olivier, could you attach the new file to a bugzilla ticket? It's hard to
ON> >extract from your
>Olivier, could you attach the new file to a bugzilla ticket? It's hard to
>extract from your original email.
That's what I though, how to *attach* anything in bugzilla? I see
nowhere mention of such attachement.
I understood that it was not supposed to be dumped in the
"Description:" textarea,
Olivier, could you attach the new file to a bugzilla ticket? It's hard to
extract from your original email.
Thanks,
C
Olivier Nicole wrote:
ON>
ON> There was a typo in this one, I missed the 96
ON>
ON> lang fr describe DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX L'entête Date: est plus de 96 heures
après la
12 matches
Mail list logo
