Re: [SAtalk] OT: vague rejection from Grumman mailservers

2003-05-27 Thread Alan Leghart
--On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 9:03 PM -0400 Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 04:41 PM 5/27/2003 -0700, Alan Leghart wrote: 2. You don't have proper reverse DNS: adsl-66-143-181-9.dsl.austtx.swbell.net Where's the RFC stating that this is invalid? AFAIK it is perfectly acceptable for forwar

Re: [SAtalk] OT: vague rejection from Grumman mailservers

2003-05-27 Thread Matt Kettler
At 04:41 PM 5/27/2003 -0700, Alan Leghart wrote: 2. You don't have proper reverse DNS: adsl-66-143-181-9.dsl.austtx.swbell.net Where's the RFC stating that this is invalid? AFAIK it is perfectly acceptable for forward and reverse DNS to mismatch if there are multiple names associated with a given

Re: [SAtalk] OT: vague rejection from Grumman mailservers

2003-05-27 Thread Alan Leghart
--On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:24 PM -0500 Bob Apthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Sorry to burden the list with this but I can't handle this directly, for obvious reasons. My bad for sending a direct courtesy copy; can one of the nice mail admins at Grumman explain how they concluded that 66.