RE: [SAtalk] Mistake-based training

> i use postfix with sa and procmail to delivier the mails > local to the outlook 2000 clients. my problem now is: how can > i report a false negative from an outlook client to sa? in > the faq i've seen the the posibility to forward the message with > > > (double-click to open the mail in its

RE: [SAtalk] Mistake-based training

; -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 02:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Mistake-based training Simplest thing I've found is to have users move the entire item to a Public Folder, y

Re: [SAtalk] Mistake-based training

> i use postfix with sa and procmail to delivier the mails local to the > outlook 2000 clients. > my problem now is: > how can i report a false negative from an outlook client to sa? > in the faq i've seen the the posibility to forward the message with > If you're using IMAP, you could make each u

RE: [SAtalk] Mistake-based training

TED] > Sent: 19 October 2003 09:14 > To: christof graf; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Mistake-based training > > > Outlook (when used with Exchange) sucks in this regard. I wrote up my > experiences at <http://www.dankohn.com/archives/000323.html>. > &g

RE: [SAtalk] Mistake-based training

Outlook (when used with Exchange) sucks in this regard. I wrote up my experiences at . The simple answer is that the training is still useful even with much of the original header being lost. It's just not as effective as it could be. - da