At Mon Jan 6 15:42:32 2003, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> could be altered to that:
>
> M(F)IM(])E-(*/
> *)V(y)e(7)r(*)s(U*0)i(*LZ)o(H)n(.):(l)
> 1(:*=).0
> Content-Type: mul(26)t(fH*)ip(|*)a(***)rt(*)/
> mi(/*j)x(8)e('M)d;
> (<|)bo(*,)u(1**)nda(D)r(L+K)y=TFICLMGJ
>
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 the voices made Ray Dzek write:
RD> Umm...Since this thread started on another list, could somebody please
RD> explain, in english, the significance of the munged header?
Just reread the first one to this list, it was by me and it included the URL
to the story.
The significa
Monday, January 06, 2003 10:08 AM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] MIME-headers with comments in them
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony L. Svanstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 06 January 2003 15:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] MIME-he
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 the voices made Tony Hoyle write:
TH> I'm more worried about what happens when a virus starts using this - how
TH> many mailers
TH> are able to block executable attachments when the mime data is munged this
TH> badly?
What really worries me is what happens when people start re
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony L. Svanstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 06 January 2003 15:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] MIME-headers with comments in them
>
>
> Any bets on how long it'll take before some of the major
> spammers start
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> SA is running fine but e-mails marked as spam, which are still delivered,
> have no embedded images.
>
> error below:
>
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of thi
CTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] MIME problems
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:38:11AM -0800, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> > Smith, Rick wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone working on this currently ? I see it's been assigned in CVS,
> > > wondering if there's a st
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:38:11AM -0800, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Smith, Rick wrote:
>
> > Anyone working on this currently ? I see it's been assigned in CVS,
> > wondering if there's a status function somewhere that developers fill
> > out when it's been completed...
>
> As far as I know, nob
Smith, Rick wrote:
> Anyone working on this currently ? I see it's been assigned in CVS,
> wondering if there's a status function somewhere that developers fill
> out when it's been completed...
As far as I know, nobody is working on it at the moment. The only tracking info
is the bugzilla t
ent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Smith, Rick
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] MIME problems
>
>
> Rick, not positive this answers your questions, but:
>
> you can currently make the report appear only in the headers,
> thereby not
> breaking
Rick, not positive this answers your questions, but:
you can currently make the report appear only in the headers, thereby not
breaking MIME stuff. Just use the report_header config file option.
If you're talking about http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18 that
will take a littl
Ok, thank. In CVS now.
Matthew Cline wrote:
> Here's a CVS patch which fixes the problem of the spam report being added
> before the first MIME part.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/
12 matches
Mail list logo
