Re: [SAtalk] local.cf ignored by SA 2.6

2003-09-25 Thread Matt Kettler
At 04:26 PM 9/25/03 -0400, Dominic Germain wrote: I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup I already done on my "real" server. There is 2 differences: I use SA 2.60 instead of 2.55 and I use Perl 5.6.0 instead of 5.8.0... I can't figure why SA 2.6 ignore my /etc/mai

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf ignored by SA 2.6

2003-09-25 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 19:35, Javier Henderson wrote: > * Dominic Germain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030925 17:34]: > > Hi, > > > > > > I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup I > > already done on my "real" server. There is 2 differences: I use SA > > 2.60 instead of 2.5

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf ignored by SA 2.6

2003-09-25 Thread Javier Henderson
* Dominic Germain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030925 17:34]: > Hi, > > > I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup I > already done on my "real" server. There is 2 differences: I use SA > 2.60 instead of 2.55 and I use Perl 5.6.0 instead of 5.8.0... I can't > figure why S

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf ignored by SA 2.6

2003-09-25 Thread Fred I-IS.COM
SA 2.6 uses /perl/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf It's in the docs and if you use -D (for debug) it will tell you where it's looking. Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. Dominic Germain wrote: > Hi, > > > I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf not being read..... Please help

2003-09-23 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Chris Tatro wrote: > Can anyone please help me on this? I presume you've run "spamassassin -D --lint" ? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf not being used????

2003-09-19 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Michael W. Cocke wrote: > here's part of my local.cf file - > > rawtext MSCUST6a /latest version of security update/i > describe MSCUST6a another MS worm > score MSCUST6a 5 > > full MSCUST6 /latest version of security update/i > describe MSCUST6 msjunk > score MSCUST6 5 > > an

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf ignored

2003-07-28 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Covington, Chris wrote: I'm running SA 2.55 on two RH 9 servers each with Postfix 2.0.13 and amavisd-new (20030616) installed in default locations. Though SA is running great with its default settings, it seems that the local.cf file in /etc/mail/spamassassin isn't being used (IE it's ignored), t

Re: [SAtalk] Local.cf

2003-07-07 Thread Matt Kettler
At 04:11 AM 7/3/2003 +0200, Andrea Riela wrote: Hi folks, I've problem with spamassassin 2.5x and local.cf on OpenBSD 3.3. I would see X-Spam-Report in the headers, but I can't. Report_header 1 doesn't work. Why? How could I see that? report_header is no longer a valid snort option. Read the curre

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf subject change not working?

2003-05-27 Thread Catherine Pinatiello
Catherine Pinatiello wrote: Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Catherine Pinatiello wrote: I have another server setup to use Spamassassin with the same /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and it works just fine. What things should I check besides local.cf in this inst

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf subject change not working?

2003-05-27 Thread Catherine Pinatiello
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Catherine Pinatiello wrote: I have another server setup to use Spamassassin with the same /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and it works just fine. What things should I check besides local.cf in this instance? Did you restart spamd

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf subject change not working?

2003-05-27 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Catherine Pinatiello wrote: > I have another server setup to use Spamassassin with the same > /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and it works just fine. What things > should I check besides local.cf in this instance? Did you restart spamd? -- Randomly Gen

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf doesnt seem to work

2002-11-08 Thread Ray Dzek
This is a totaly stupid question, but... Did you restart spamd after you made the local.cf changes? How do I know this is a stupid question? Guess. :-) - Original Message - From: "Thomas Nyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:08 AM Subject

RE: [SAtalk] local.cf doesnt seem to work

2002-11-08 Thread Steve Thomas
Can you provide an example of an e-mail that got through, with all the headers? | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of | Thomas Nyman | Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:09 AM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: [SAtalk] local.cf doesnt seem

Re: re : [SAtalk] local.cf syntax

2002-10-25 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:57:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I want to block all messages with VIAGRA, FREE, SEX, PORN, etc in the subject of a >message. I would set the score to a very high value. > > How would I define the syntax in the local.cf file? Would the score also be in the >lo

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf syntax

2002-10-25 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 07:16:10PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Would I add the rule to the local.cf file or spamassassin.cf file and put the score >as well in the local.cf file? I've seen recently where there seems to be some confusion on how SA deals with config files: - Read all

RE: [SAtalk] local.cf syntax

2002-10-25 Thread dmarie-spamassasin
Posté par Damian Mendoza le 25/10. What if I wanted to block specific subject keywords that are not already defined as a spamassassin rule? >> you can specify your own rule ... that is what rox in SA. its user configurable! Would I add the rule to the local.cf file or spamassassin.cf file and

RE: [SAtalk] local.cf

2002-10-25 Thread Damian Mendoza
Brad, I block about 80% of the spam from five k-12 school districts - 35% of their mail is SPAM - approx 1350 messages per day for each district is SPAM. I'm using the default score of "5" with no local.cf file at this time. Regards, Damian -Original Message- From: Brad Reichert [mail

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf

2002-10-25 Thread Paul Oster
I've balanced mine by setting required_hits to 4, and using whitelist_from to make sure I get mail from others that might be generating a false positive. Paul Brad Reichert wrote: Would anyone with a well defined local.cf file be willing to share with me? I'm just getting started with Spam Ass

Re: *****SPAM***** re : [SAtalk] local.cf syntax

2002-10-24 Thread David Lloyd
Hello, > SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results > -- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original > message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar > unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for > more details. SPAM

re : [SAtalk] local.cf syntax

2002-10-24 Thread dmarie-spamassasin
Posté par Damian Mendoza le 25/10. Hi, I want to block all messages with VIAGRA, FREE, SEX, PORN, etc in the subject of a message. I would set the score to a very high value. How would I define the syntax in the local.cf file? Would the score also be in the local.cf file? >> for sitewide impl

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf functions not parsed

2002-06-03 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:54:07PM +0200, Sweethome.co.il Webmaster wrote: > Hi, > > First, funny thing happened today, I got the Digest flagged as spam > (8.2/6.8) > > I have spamd installed with spamproxyd on a Postfix machine. > I think my /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.cf file is not parsed, a

Re: [SAtalk] Local.cf

2002-04-17 Thread Craig R Hughes
Two comments: 1. This is covered in the FAQ 2. If you thought of restarting spamd as being a possible thing you need to try, why not try it, and see if it's required. C Kenneth Garreau Jr. wrote: KGJ> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 11:17:15 -0400 KGJ> From: Kenneth Garreau Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KGJ

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin not being checked

2002-04-10 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Craig R. Hughes stated: > Uhoh, since when did they start using the 80.0.0.0 netblock? Your email was > slamming against my firewall for the last 2 days... > > C > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from s1.uklinux

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin not being checked

2002-04-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:05:21PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote: > Uhoh, since when did they start using the 80.0.0.0 netblock? Your email was > slamming against my firewall for the last 2 days... Be wary of blocking networks because they're listed as "unassigned". I found a firewall at a client

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin not being checked

2002-04-09 Thread Craig R Hughes
Uhoh, since when did they start using the 80.0.0.0 netblock? Your email was slamming against my firewall for the last 2 days... C Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from s1.uklinux.net (mail.uklinux.net [80.84.72.21]) by belphegore.hughes-family.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA10

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin not being checked

2002-04-05 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Craig R. Hughes spake thusly: > ls -ld /etc/mail/spamassassin? And what uid is spamd running as? > sean@bsod:~ > ls -ld /etc/mail/spamassassin drwxr-xr-x 2 exim exim 84 Apr 5 10:28 /etc/mail/spamassassin sean@bs

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin not being checked

2002-04-05 Thread Craig R Hughes
ls -ld /etc/mail/spamassassin? And what uid is spamd running as? C Sean Rima wrote: > Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 18:51:08 +0100 > From: Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin not being checked > &g

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin not being checked

2002-04-05 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes outgrape: > ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin ? > sean@bsod:~ > ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin/ total 8 - -rwx-- 1 exim exim 848 Apr 5 10:28 local.cf - -rwx-- 1 root root 631 Apr 5 10:24

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin not being checked

2002-04-05 Thread Craig Hughes
ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin ? C On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 01:56, Sean Rima wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes told this: > > > What does spamassassin -D say? > > > > > debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for default rules dir > debug: u

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin not being checked

2002-04-05 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes told this: > What does spamassassin -D say? > debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for default rules dir debug: using "/etc/mail/spamassassin" for site rules dir debug: using "/home/sean/.spamassassin" for user state

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin not being checked

2002-04-04 Thread Craig Hughes
What does spamassassin -D say? C On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 15:44, Sean Rima wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I am using the current CVS and have my local.cf with all my > whitelist_from lines in /etc/mail/spamassassin but this is not being > checked. Once I moved it to /