Not using Exim here. Am I getting closer with the following?
To =~ /^?$/i
Ed
~~
At 12:52 PM Tuesday, 3/19/2002, dman wrote -=>
>On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:10:08AM -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
>| On 18 March 2002, Ed Kasky said:
>| > I am in the process of learning regex and have a question if someon
On 19 March 2002, dman said:
> A simpler approach :
>
> If you're using exim 3 put
> headers_check_syntax = true
> in your config file.
>
> If you're using exim 4 put
> require verify = header_syntax
> in the acl_smtp_data ACL.
Yes, those can both be useful. I've been using headers_ch
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:10:08AM -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
| On 18 March 2002, Ed Kasky said:
| > I am in the process of learning regex and have a question if someone has a
| > minute
| >
| > Based on the following headers, is this the correct addition to
| > 20_head_tests.cf?
| >
| > head
On 18 March 2002, Ed Kasky said:
> I am in the process of learning regex and have a question if someone has a
> minute
>
> Based on the following headers, is this the correct addition to
> 20_head_tests.cf?
>
> header UNDISC_RECIPTo =~ /^Undisclosed-Recipient*:\s*;$/
> describe
Ed,
>header UNDISC_RECIPTo =~ /^Undisclosed-Recipient*:\s*;$/
I think your regexpr miss to catch the < and > that surround the
"Undiclosed...".
It matchs a line starting with "Undisclosed" and continuing with
"recipient" (none to many t at the end) followed by none to many
spaces, e
