Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-02 Thread Kelsey Cummings
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:41:56AM -0600, Charlie Watts wrote: > On Wed, 1 May 2002, Kelsey Cummings wrote: > > > Take a look at spamd times. I checked the razor list and didn't see any > > chatter about lagged servers but it sure looks like razor is suffering a > > bit right now. I've seen pro

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-02 Thread Charlie Watts
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Kelsey Cummings wrote: > Take a look at spamd times. I checked the razor list and didn't see any > chatter about lagged servers but it sure looks like razor is suffering a > bit right now. I've seen processing times >100 seconds... Can you share your bit of spamd + cricket

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 01 May 2002, Sean Rima outgrape: >> Have you guys turned this on for sonic.net with DCC running against a >> non-local DCC server? >> > > I just checked my mail log for something else and noticed : May 1 > 23:42:18 bsod spamd[3575]: connect

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 1 May 2002, Scott Doty said: >> > On Wed, 1 May 2002, Michael Moncur told this: >> > >> > > I did a quick check of the email I've received since setting up >> > > DCC support and the results are impressive: >> > > >> > > Total spam messages

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 1 May 2002, Craig R. Hughes spake thusly: > Have you guys turned this on for sonic.net with DCC running against a > non-local DCC server? > I just checked my mail log for something else and noticed : May 1 23:42:18 bsod spamd[3575]: connec

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Kelsey Cummings
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:55:21PM -0700, Scott Doty wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:52:42PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote: > > Have you guys turned this on for sonic.net with DCC running against a non-local > > DCC server? > > Actually, not yet, I was in error: we aren't using DCC on our spam

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 1 May 2002, Bart Schaefer outgrape: > I've been running the CVS version with DCC included since yesterday > and have yet to see a single DCC hit. (Perhaps there's something else > I don't have set up, that I need?) > What does 'cdcc info'

RE: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Rose, Bobby
there wasn't a timeout. Not sure what's up. -Original Message- From: Scott Doty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:33 PM To: Kelsey Cummings Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:05:13PM -0700, Kelsey

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Scott Doty
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:52:42PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote: > Have you guys turned this on for sonic.net with DCC running against a non-local > DCC server? Actually, not yet, I was in error: we aren't using DCC on our spamcan server. Kelsey and I have exchanged email about the spamd timeout

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Craig R Hughes
Bart Schaefer wrote: BS> I've been running the CVS version with DCC included since yesterday and BS> have yet to see a single DCC hit. (Perhaps there's something else I don't BS> have set up, that I need?) Well, you have to download and install DCC itself... Otherwise should be automatic. BS>

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Craig R Hughes
Have you guys turned this on for sonic.net with DCC running against a non-local DCC server? C Scott Doty wrote: SD> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:05:13PM -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote: SD> > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:38:29PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote: SD> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- SD> >

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Bart Schaefer
I've been running the CVS version with DCC included since yesterday and have yet to see a single DCC hit. (Perhaps there's something else I don't have set up, that I need?) Since we're comparing rule effectiveness, I scanned my archive of spams (which I keep on a 14 day rotation) and counted the

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Scott Doty
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:05:13PM -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:38:29PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Wed, 1 May 2002, Michael Moncur told this: > > > > > I did a quick check of the email I've received since

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Kelsey Cummings
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:38:29PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 1 May 2002, Michael Moncur told this: > > > I did a quick check of the email I've received since setting up DCC > > support and the results are impressive: > > > > Total spam

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 1 May 2002, Michael Moncur told this: > I did a quick check of the email I've received since setting up DCC > support and the results are impressive: > > Total spam messages received: 109 > Listed in DCC: 50 (46%) > Listed in Razor: 41 (38%)

Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results

2002-05-01 Thread Craig R Hughes
Michael Moncur wrote: MM> I did a quick check of the email I've received since setting up DCC support MM> and the results are impressive: MM> MM> Total spam messages received: 109 MM> Listed in DCC: 50 (46%) MM> Listed in Razor: 41 (38%) MM> Listed in both: 25 (23%) MM> MM> I had no idea DCC alre