On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:41:56AM -0600, Charlie Watts wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2002, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
>
> > Take a look at spamd times. I checked the razor list and didn't see any
> > chatter about lagged servers but it sure looks like razor is suffering a
> > bit right now. I've seen pro
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
> Take a look at spamd times. I checked the razor list and didn't see any
> chatter about lagged servers but it sure looks like razor is suffering a
> bit right now. I've seen processing times >100 seconds...
Can you share your bit of spamd + cricket
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 01 May 2002, Sean Rima outgrape:
>> Have you guys turned this on for sonic.net with DCC running against a
>> non-local DCC server?
>>
>
> I just checked my mail log for something else and noticed : May 1
> 23:42:18 bsod spamd[3575]: connect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Scott Doty said:
>> > On Wed, 1 May 2002, Michael Moncur told this:
>> >
>> > > I did a quick check of the email I've received since setting up
>> > > DCC support and the results are impressive:
>> > >
>> > > Total spam messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Craig R. Hughes spake thusly:
> Have you guys turned this on for sonic.net with DCC running against a
> non-local DCC server?
>
I just checked my mail log for something else and noticed :
May 1 23:42:18 bsod spamd[3575]: connec
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:55:21PM -0700, Scott Doty wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:52:42PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> > Have you guys turned this on for sonic.net with DCC running against a non-local
> > DCC server?
>
> Actually, not yet, I was in error: we aren't using DCC on our spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Bart Schaefer outgrape:
> I've been running the CVS version with DCC included since yesterday
> and have yet to see a single DCC hit. (Perhaps there's something else
> I don't have set up, that I need?)
>
What does 'cdcc info'
there wasn't a timeout. Not sure what's up.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Doty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Kelsey Cummings
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Early DCC results
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:05:13PM -0700, Kelsey
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:52:42PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Have you guys turned this on for sonic.net with DCC running against a non-local
> DCC server?
Actually, not yet, I was in error: we aren't using DCC on our spamcan
server.
Kelsey and I have exchanged email about the spamd timeout
Bart Schaefer wrote:
BS> I've been running the CVS version with DCC included since yesterday and
BS> have yet to see a single DCC hit. (Perhaps there's something else I don't
BS> have set up, that I need?)
Well, you have to download and install DCC itself... Otherwise should be
automatic.
BS>
Have you guys turned this on for sonic.net with DCC running against a non-local
DCC server?
C
Scott Doty wrote:
SD> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:05:13PM -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
SD> > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:38:29PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
SD> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SD> >
I've been running the CVS version with DCC included since yesterday and
have yet to see a single DCC hit. (Perhaps there's something else I don't
have set up, that I need?)
Since we're comparing rule effectiveness, I scanned my archive of spams
(which I keep on a 14 day rotation) and counted the
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:05:13PM -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:38:29PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wed, 1 May 2002, Michael Moncur told this:
> >
> > > I did a quick check of the email I've received since
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:38:29PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 1 May 2002, Michael Moncur told this:
>
> > I did a quick check of the email I've received since setting up DCC
> > support and the results are impressive:
> >
> > Total spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Michael Moncur told this:
> I did a quick check of the email I've received since setting up DCC
> support and the results are impressive:
>
> Total spam messages received: 109
> Listed in DCC: 50 (46%)
> Listed in Razor: 41 (38%)
Michael Moncur wrote:
MM> I did a quick check of the email I've received since setting up DCC support
MM> and the results are impressive:
MM>
MM> Total spam messages received: 109
MM> Listed in DCC: 50 (46%)
MM> Listed in Razor: 41 (38%)
MM> Listed in both: 25 (23%)
MM>
MM> I had no idea DCC alre
16 matches
Mail list logo