Hello,
* Philipp Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16.06.02 07:10]:
> * Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16.06.02 06:18]:
> > The only other thing I can think of offhand is, does the procmail process
> > perhaps have its resource limits set smaller than the interactive shell?
> Looks like perl 5.6.1
Hello,
* Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16.06.02 06:18]:
> The only other thing I can think of offhand is, does the procmail process
> perhaps have its resource limits set smaller than the interactive shell?
Well, if I use spamc/spamd it works well, so you are probably right. So I
will do
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Philipp Grau wrote:
> * Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [15.06.02 20:09]:
> > Let's see the procmail rule. It might be procmail that's running out of
> > memory -- there is a known allocation bug in procmail 3.22.
>
> Ok. here we go:
Hmm, that doesn't look like something
Hello,
* Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [15.06.02 20:09]:
> Let's see the procmail rule. It might be procmail that's running out of
> memory -- there is a known allocation bug in procmail 3.22.
Ok. here we go:
,[ /home/phgrau/.procmailrc ]
| MAILDIR=/home/phgrau/Mail
| LOGFILE=$MAILDIR
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Philipp Grau wrote:
> after upgrading to perl 5.6.1 on our IRIX 6.5.16 maschine, we ran into
> some trouble. SA (no matter what version 2.20, 2.21 or 2.30) does not
> run with procmail, on commandline no problem. The same program versions
> work on a linux system quite well.