Re: [SAtalk] Debugging advice needed

2002-06-18 Thread Philipp Grau
Hello, * Philipp Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16.06.02 07:10]: > * Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16.06.02 06:18]: > > The only other thing I can think of offhand is, does the procmail process > > perhaps have its resource limits set smaller than the interactive shell? > Looks like perl 5.6.1

Re: [SAtalk] Debugging advice needed

2002-06-15 Thread Philipp Grau
Hello, * Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16.06.02 06:18]: > The only other thing I can think of offhand is, does the procmail process > perhaps have its resource limits set smaller than the interactive shell? Well, if I use spamc/spamd it works well, so you are probably right. So I will do

Re: [SAtalk] Debugging advice needed

2002-06-15 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Philipp Grau wrote: > * Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [15.06.02 20:09]: > > Let's see the procmail rule. It might be procmail that's running out of > > memory -- there is a known allocation bug in procmail 3.22. > > Ok. here we go: Hmm, that doesn't look like something

Re: [SAtalk] Debugging advice needed

2002-06-15 Thread Philipp Grau
Hello, * Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [15.06.02 20:09]: > Let's see the procmail rule. It might be procmail that's running out of > memory -- there is a known allocation bug in procmail 3.22. Ok. here we go: ,[ /home/phgrau/.procmailrc ] | MAILDIR=/home/phgrau/Mail | LOGFILE=$MAILDIR

Re: [SAtalk] Debugging advice needed

2002-06-15 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Philipp Grau wrote: > after upgrading to perl 5.6.1 on our IRIX 6.5.16 maschine, we ran into > some trouble. SA (no matter what version 2.20, 2.21 or 2.30) does not > run with procmail, on commandline no problem. The same program versions > work on a linux system quite well.