RE: [SAtalk] Bigevil rules not being used..

2003-12-31 Thread Gary Smith
Did you restart SA? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mathieu Nantel Sent: Tue 12/30/2003 8:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: [SAtalk] Bigevil rules not being used.. Good day,

RE: [SAtalk] Bigevil rules not being used..

2003-12-31 Thread Timothy Donahue
> Is there something I'm missing here? I was under the > impression that SA parses > all .cf files from the share/spamassassin folder. > Without more information about your setup, I am just guessing at what might be the problem. If you are running a program like amavisd-new, which chroot's i

Re: [SAtalk] Bigevil rules not being used..

2003-12-30 Thread Mathieu Nantel
You'll find it more silly than that: I'm rejecting high-scoring spam (15+ is what I call "high") through simple postfix header checks. Since my average score for spam is about 13, the default 3 points added by the bigevil rules resulted in about 200 spams being rejected since yesterday... Sorry

Re: [SAtalk] Bigevil rules not being used..

2003-12-30 Thread Matt Thoene
On Tuesday, December 30, 2003 @ 8:01:31 AM [-0700], Mathieu Nantel wrote: > Is there something I'm missing here? I was under the impression that SA parses > all .cf files from the share/spamassassin folder. That should be working. Are you using spamd? If so, did you restart the daemon? -- Matt