Same here, just because I'm lazy and don't want to change my email address -
used since 94 - not to mention having catch-alls for several domains, other
addresses currently posted as mailtos on the web, in old deja/google archives
etc. None ever submitted to a p0rn site.
I also use domain specif
I completely agree that SA is incredible I'm not even using bayes! Here are
my stats:
90% of marked spam is scored over 7 and goes into spamtrap! Not even
delivered. I've had 4 FPs since Febuary!
Stats per log. Totals to a month worth.
-rw--- 1 root root 4.6M May 30 12:00 /var/l
> "SP" == Steve Prior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SP> I'd start to question what that employee is doing that is getting him
SP> on that many spammer lists - does this employee actually do stuff or just
SP> register his email address with pr0n sites all day...
I've had the same email address s
On Thu, 29 May 2003 15:49:40 -0700
"Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, let me second those att-a-boys. Spamassassin is a demonstration of
> what a full spectrum, high technology implementation can do. It solves an
> important problem, and solves it well. Congrats to the SA team (and t
Jack Gostl wrote:
No... it doesn't take much at all. The "employee" as the president of the
company. He made a bunch of sales on eBay, purchased a handful of things
from online outfits, and POW! He was getting upwards of 200 per day. I can
understand it happening to me, I post in various newsgroups
> I'd start to question what that employee is doing that is getting him
> on that many spammer lists - does this employee actually do stuff or just
> register his email address with pr0n sites all day...
No... it doesn't take much at all. The "employee" as the president of the
company. He made a
> > I now have users complaining that they receive as much as 5 spams out of
> > 500. This is absurdity worthy of the Marx brothers.
> >
> > Nice job. Keep at it guys.
> >
>
> Amen to that!
>
> 5 spams? Heh, show them how much they WOULD get if it wasn't for
> SpamAssassin. :)
>
> spam-stats
Jack Gostl wrote:
Someone posted a message here saying that SA "really kicks ass". I know it
is an international community on this list, so let's make sure we all
understand it was a compliment. It was also an understatement.
Amidst all the questions in here, I wouldn't want the developers to lose
First, let me second those att-a-boys. Spamassassin is a demonstration of
what a full spectrum, high technology implementation can do. It solves an
important problem, and solves it well. Congrats to the SA team (and to the
supporting cast of Razor, Pyzor, DCC and the RBL's).
> OK, time for show an
Wow, I don't think I've seen an AOL! thread on SATalk before :)
But hey while were at it.. Me Too! :)
( For an explanation of AOL! see
http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/A/AOL.html )
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equ
> OK, time for show and tell, I guess. This is yesterday on one of my two
> SA+MD relays:
> spam: 34,587
> clean: 16,882
> bounced: 426
> discarded: 719
> skipped: 6310
> processed: 58,924
>
> (I forgot to count access_db bounces, oh well... this shows what SA+MD
> alone processed)
>
> I have a 2nd
Jeremy Oddo wrote:
I agree fully. I have a very light-traffic server (10 users across 3
domains). One of our employees would receive 120+ SPAM messages a day. I
decided to put SA in place mainly for him (although I put every user on
it). He's still getting a lot of SPAM...it's just not making i
Jack Gostl said:
>
> Someone posted a message here saying that SA "really kicks ass".
Hee Hee. I know I posted that very saying about SA, but I did so on the
vpopmail maillist.
> I know
> it is an international community on this list, so let's make sure we all
> understand it was a compliment. It
Here here as well
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 1:16 PM
To: SpamAssassin listserve
And a big "Amen!" from the choir!
TC
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin listserve" <[E
--On Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:50 PM -0700 Jonathan Nichols
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
spam-stats from one of the co-lo machines:
spam: 304
clean: 80
skipped: 0
total: 384
processed: 384
OK, time for show and tell, I guess. This is yesterday on one of my two
SA+MD relays:
spam: 34,587
clean: 16,8
al Message -
From: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin listserve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy
>
> >
> > I now have users complaining that they receive as much as 5 s
Aye, ATTABOY! Definitely a kick ass piece of
software.> spam-stats from one of the co-lo machines:> spam:
304> clean: 80> skipped: 0> total: 384> processed:
384>> The mail log was rotated earlier this morning. And yes, the
stats are> accurate.. only 80 legit mails, everything else SPAM. If
And a big "Amen!" from the choir!
TC
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin listserve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 2:17 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Attaboy
>
> Someone posted a message here saying that SA "really kicks ass". I know it
I now have users complaining that they receive as much as 5 spams out of
500. This is absurdity worthy of the Marx brothers.
Nice job. Keep at it guys.
Amen to that!
5 spams? Heh, show them how much they WOULD get if it wasn't for
SpamAssassin. :)
spam-stats from one of the co-lo machines:
spa
19 matches
Mail list logo
